Can Timelines Intersect or Travel in Different Directions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kawika
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the nature of timelines in parallel universes, particularly in relation to the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. It addresses four key questions: whether timelines can intersect, be offset in time, travel at different rates, or move in opposite directions while sharing a moment in time. The consensus is that timelines do not intersect after branching, cannot be compared in terms of time, and do not travel at different rates or in opposite directions. This perspective highlights the limitations of current scientific understanding compared to popular sci-fi portrayals of parallel universes. The conversation emphasizes the need for simple visual explanations of complex concepts.
kawika
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I noticed in SciFi they usually show parallel universes as traveling in the same direction at the same rate. I have four questions, please excuse the simplistic description.

1. Can two timelines intersect ( X ) such that they momentarily pass through the same space?

2. Can two timelines be parallel to each other but be offset in relative time (ex: 2pm in one is 1:59pm in the other)?

3. Can two timelines travel at different rates such that they get further and further in relative time?

4. Can two timelines be parallel but travel in opposite directions so they have the same relative time only once?

I realize this is a simple description but I have to be able to explain to people in simple visual terms.

Thanks for the comments.
Kawika
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by kawika
I noticed in SciFi they usually show parallel universes as traveling in the same direction at the same rate. I have four questions, please excuse the simplistic description.

1. Can two timelines intersect ( X ) such that they momentarily pass through the same space?

2. Can two timelines be parallel to each other but be offset in relative time (ex: 2pm in one is 1:59pm in the other)?

3. Can two timelines travel at different rates such that they get further and further in relative time?

4. Can two timelines be parallel but travel in opposite directions so they have the same relative time only once?

I realize this is a simple description but I have to be able to explain to people in simple visual terms.

Thanks for the comments.
Kawika

These answers are based on the manyworlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Other theories may differ.

1. No. Timelines branch off from each other and do not interect after that.
2. Since they don't interact, there's no way to compare time.
3. Same as 2.
4. No.

I realize this is not like the "parallel worlds" in sf, but it's the only theory that's even approximately acceptible to physicists.
 
Times is enable in same point

One point, as it is permit to pass many light wave or particles, it is enable in different progress and time serious, but it is only in bose progress, don't in action or femi progress or mass progress. so many interest progress is hard still... .
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top