Can unitary operators on hilbert space behaive like rotations?

cyeus
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


unitary operators on hilbert space


Homework Equations


is there a unitary operator on a (finite or infinite) Hilbert space so that cU(x)=y, for some
constant (real or complex), where x and y are fixed non-zero elements in H ?


The Attempt at a Solution


I know the answer in R^2, it is enough to consider U a suitable rotation so that U(x)
be a point on the straight line Ry={ry; r ε R}, and then there is a scaler r in R so that
rU(x)=y. I guess this is true for R^n too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would need to define "rotation" in a Hilbert space. In 2D Euclidean space it is a one-parameter linear transformation. Scaling is also a one-parameter linear transformation. Together that is two parameters, which is just enough to describe any element in 2D. This, of course, would not work in a higher-dimensional space, not even Euclidean 3D.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top