Can Volume and Linear Charge Densities Be Interchanged in Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the interchangeability of volume charge density (ρ) and linear charge density (λ) in calculations involving cylindrical geometries. It questions whether the relationship r(enclosed) = λh can be adapted to r(enclosed) = ρh. Additionally, it explores whether the electric field (E) inside a cylindrical Gaussian surface equals the electric field of the entire cylinder when the charge distribution is uniform. The conversation also seeks clarification on whether the enclosed charge (q) is equivalent to the total charge (Q(total)). Understanding these concepts is crucial for applying Gauss's law correctly in electrostatics.
MtHaleyGirl
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
OK, I may be out of my league here so feel free to let me know (in a nice way please) but conceptually & every other way I can come up with, I am trying to put together volume charge density, linear charge density and surface charge density ... for example in my text it says that in terms of a cylinder r(enclosed)=λh where λ is linear charge density and r is the radius of a cylinder - can I interchange ρ (for volume charge density) and λ such that r(enclosed) = ρh? - AND if I have a uniform charge distribution and I use a cylindrical gaussian surface enclosed in a larger cylinder (r for the gauss. cyl. < R -- the whole cylinder) does E(enclosed in the gauss. cyl.) = E as in the whole cylinder? Thats what Gauss's law is saying?? right?? and is q (enclosed) the same as Q(total)? ---- Thanks for any help - trying not to be a physics flunky ---- :shy:
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Calculating Linear Charge Density of a Cylinder
Replies
1
Views
2K
The flux through a cylinder from a charge at the origin
Replies
5
Views
356
Using Gauss's Law to Calculate Charge Density Function
Replies
10
Views
2K
Electric Field Inside Cylindrical Capacitor
Replies
2
Views
2K
Charge upon a parallel plate capacitor
Replies
18
Views
3K
How Do You Calculate Charge Density in a Uniform Sphere?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Calculating total charge when the electric field is given
Replies
7
Views
1K
Coulomb's law to find electric field for charge density function
Replies
11
Views
1K
E&M: Gauss' Law Surface Charge Density
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Thought I Understood Gauss' Law (Sheets)
Replies
26
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top