Can We Define Acceleration for Speed Using Average Acceleration Formula?

AI Thread Summary
Acceleration can be defined for speed using the average acceleration formula, where average acceleration is calculated as (b-a)/(t2-t1) for speeds at two different times. This concept relates to tangential acceleration, which is the component of acceleration in the direction of velocity. Velocity is a vector, and changes in either speed or direction indicate acceleration. The theorem in differential geometry states that a particle's total acceleration can be expressed as the sum of tangential and centripetal acceleration. Understanding these components is crucial for analyzing motion, especially when speed is not constant.
phymatter
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
just got a bit confused : because acceleration is a vector , so can we define acceleration for speed , that is , if we say speed at t1 is a , t2 is b , then average acceleraion is (b-a)/(t2-t1) pl. help !
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Yes; the quantity you're interested in is called "tangential acceleration."

And now for a more thorough answer than you wanted:
Velocity is a vector, so it has both a magnitude and a direction. (The magnitude of the velocity is called "speed," as you are already aware.) Acceleration is a change in velocity. Thus if either the speed or the direction of a velocity changes, an acceleration is taking place.

There's a theorem in differential geometry which says that a particle's acceleration vector can always be expressed as the sum of two vectors, called the tangential acceleration and the centripetal acceleration. Furthermore, the tangential acceleration points in the same direction as the velocity (where "same direction" includes the possibility of pointing exactly backwards, for a decelerating particle) and has a magnitude equal to the derivative of speed with respect to time, and the normal acceleration always points perpendicular to the particle's path (unless it's zero) and has a magnitude equal to the particle's instantaneous speed squared over the radius of curvature of the particle's path.

This theorem is a big deal because the magnitude of the centripetal acceleration, when written in symbols, is v^2/r. You should remember that as the formula for centripetal acceleration when a particle moves in a circle with a constant speed. What this theorem says is that if a particle *isn't* moving in a circle with constant speed, then at any instant in time you can still approximate it as a particle moving in some circle but with a changing speed, and then its acceleration is the same old centripetal acceleration PLUS a tangential acceleration corresponding to the change in speed.

This fact is a lot more exciting when it's written as an equation, but you need three or four different equations to define all of the symbols that show up.
 


thanks Penn.6-5000 !
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top