Can we demontrate the convergence of perturbation quantum field theory?

ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me this:
Can we demontrate the convergence of perturbation series of quantum field theory(Feymann
diagrams) after making the renormalizing procedure? If we can't demontrate that,why we still consider the perturbative method using in quantum field theory being useful and believable theory?
Thank you very much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry,I have had an wrong spelling:"demontrate",I mean "demonstrate".I am Vietnamese
 
ndung200790 said:
Please teach me this:
Can we demontrate the convergence of perturbation series of quantum field theory(Feymann
diagrams) after making the renormalizing procedure? If we can't demontrate that,why we still consider the perturbative method using in quantum field theory being useful and believable theory?

The renormalized perturbation series of QED is most likely divergent (and corresponding series in certain simpler l2-dimensional theories are provably divergent). But divergent asymptotic series often give useful approximations, and in case of QED even very accurate ones!
 
Please explain for me what is divergent asymtotic series.It is seem to me that being convergent series,the higher power in series,the more acurate approximation.But in devergent series,the higher power, the less acurate approximation.
 
This reference contains some discussion, including a brief statement of Dyson's intuitive argument:

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0508017"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ndung200790 said:
Please explain for me what is divergent asymptotic series.It is seem to me that being convergent series,the higher power in series,the more accurate approximation. But in divergent series, the higher power, the less accurate the approximation.

Only for sufficiently high power -- there is a difference between the limit and the approximation quality of a few terms, truncating at a fixed power. For QED, the basic arguments for the divergence of the perturbation series are given in

F.J. Dyson,
Divergence of perturbation theory in quantum electrodynamics,
Phys. Rev. 85 (1952), 613--632.

Things are explained in detail in the entry ''Summing divergent series'' of Chapter B4 of my theoretical physics FAQ at http://arnold-neumaier.at/physfaq/physics-faq.html
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top