Can We Send a Probe to Proxima Centauri?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Richard87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probe Space
AI Thread Summary
Sending a probe to Proxima Centauri is theoretically possible, but current technology would require about 75,000 years for traditional probes. Proposed projects like Project Daedalus and Project Longshot could reduce travel time to around 50 to 100 years, but they face significant technical challenges, particularly in achieving effective fusion propulsion. The main issue lies in developing a reliable inertial confinement ignition system for deuterium/helium-3 fuel, as current methods produce too many neutrons. Alternatives such as beamed energy propulsion and laser sails show promise but require substantial advancements in power generation and technology. While interstellar probes remain a distant goal, ongoing research may eventually make such missions feasible.
Richard87
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Can we send a space probe to Proxima Centauri?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Sure could. Unfortunately, if it were anything like the probes we've been sending around our own solar system, it would take about 75,000 years to get there.

For some technology that has been proposed to get the job done a little more efficiently, see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Daedalus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Longshot

These projects have, respectively ~50 and 100 year travel times to a destination like proxima centauri. So it's not really feasible at the moment, but it certainly could be done.
 
Richard87 said:
Can we send a space probe to Proxima Centauri?

Not presently, but there are plenty of paper starships to choose from. What sort of mission? Fly-by? Orbital?

Someone mentioned "Longshot" and "Daedalus" which are really the same probes designed with different assumptions - what I mean is they have the same propulsion system and "Longshot" is really just a minature version of "Daedalus". The problem with both is that we don't have an inertial confinement ignition system that we know will work using deuterium/helium-3 propellant. We can fire off D-T reactions, but they make too many neutrons. Somewhat better is D-D fusion which is harder to start, but we have achieved it in bombs.

The really problem is striking the metaphorical match hard enough. Pure deuterium reactions require a large and very quick energy input to remain confined while fusion is happening. The best option is using a small D-T "spark-plug" to start a much larger D-D fusion reaction. To get the highest exhaust velocity - what we need for interstellar probes - the fusion pulse units have to be very large, thus the vehicle itself needs to be large too. Kind of makes sending just a probe kind of pointless.

The alternative is beamed energy propulsion, but that requires a large space-based power supply. Maybe once we build a few terawatts worth of solar power satellites we'll be ready for beamed power probes. Perhaps the easiest - if the right material can be found - is Jordin Kare's Sail-Beam, which uses an ultra-powered laser to rapidly fire off small laser-sails. These transfer their momentum to the star-probe via being blasted into plasma as they approach and running into a magnetic field wrapped around the probe. Viola! Interstellar propulsion. Just needs gigawatts of laser-power.

So can we launch a probe to Proxima Centauri? Not yet. Konstantin Tsiolkovsky theorized about chemical rockets reaching space in the 1890s and in just 60 years or so they did. We haven't done everything he dreamed of yet, but our dreams may only be as far away from their fulfillment. We may just have to get over our fixation on being on just one planet to do it though.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top