Can we transfer the whole charge of a body to another body?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter oliverkahn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Charge
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that it is theoretically possible to transfer the entire charge of one conductor to another conductor. When a charged conductor (A) is enclosed by an uncharged conductor (B) and connected via a conducting wire, conductor B acquires the charge while conductor A becomes uncharged. This is supported by the application of Gauss's law, which indicates that once equilibrium is reached, the electric field between the two conductors is zero, leading to all charge residing on the outer surface of conductor B. The conclusion is that the charge transfer can indeed occur in practice, provided the system is properly configured.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and charge distribution
  • Familiarity with Gauss's law and Gaussian surfaces
  • Knowledge of conductors and their properties in electrostatics
  • Basic principles of electric fields and potential
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Gauss's law in depth, focusing on its applications in electrostatics
  • Explore the behavior of electric fields in conductors and insulators
  • Investigate practical experiments demonstrating charge transfer between conductors
  • Learn about the implications of charge distribution in complex conductor systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of electrostatics and charge transfer mechanisms.

oliverkahn
Messages
27
Reaction score
2
When I asked "Can we transfer the whole charge of a body to another body?"

my colleague replied:

"If charged body (say 5 Coulomb) is any charged conductor ##A##, it can be done by enclosing ##A## completely by second uncharged conductor ##B## and connecting them by a conducting wire ##B## will acquire 5 Coulomb and ##A## becomes uncharged.

Is this true? Can we transfer the whole charge of a body to another body?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe this is true, at least theoretically. Construct a Gaussian surface between the two bodies, there must be no electric field in the region between A and B once equilibrium has been reached. That constrains ##Q## enclosed within the surface to be zero, so all the charge must reside in B. Assuming the wire is negligible/stores no charge.

As for if it would work in practice, I've no idea!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
etotheipi said:
I believe this is true, at least theoretically. Construct a Gaussian surface between the two bodies, there must be no electric field in the region between A and B once equilibrium has been reached. That constrains ##Q## enclosed within the surface to be zero, so all the charge must reside in B.

As for if it would work in practice, I've no idea!
Thank you for your answer. I wanted to make sure if it works in practice. I guess it works so, but needs conformation.
 
I think I got the solution :

The charge always goes to the outer surface of a conductor. When we connect the two conductors ##A## and ##B## by a conducting wire, the whole system becomes a single conductor.

So the surface of "that" single conductor ##C## will be the surface of the larger conductor ##B##. So the charge will reside on the outer surface of larger conductor ##B##.

Thus we can transfer the whole charge of a conductor to another conductor.

Am I right or missing anything.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
oliverkahn said:
I think I got the solution :

The charge always goes to the outer surface of a conductor. When we connect the two conductors ##A## and ##B## by a conducting wire, the whole system becomes a single conductor.

So the surface of "that" single conductor ##C## will be the surface of the larger conductor ##B##. So the charge will reside on the outer surface of larger conductor ##B##.

Thus we can transfer the whole charge of a conductor to another conductor.

Am I right or missing anything.

Yes I think that's right, on second thoughts it's perhaps even easier to consider a Gaussian surface just below the surface of conductor B, since that requires fewer logical leaps.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K