I Can Wireless Communication Be Achieved Without EMF?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the possibility of wireless communication without electromagnetic fields (EMF), considering alternatives like sound and neutrino beams. While neutrino beams are theoretically viable, they currently lack the capacity for significant data transmission. Acoustic waves can be used for digital communication, as demonstrated by historical acoustic couplers. Visible light communication is also a well-established method, though it can be obstructed by opaque materials. The feasibility of quantum tunneling for long-distance digital communication remains uncertain due to its random nature.
Theldiot
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Is there any theoretical room for wireless communication that does not require EMF and would be unhindered by RF blocking materials or Faraday cages?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. How about sound?
 
Hahaha That's embarrassing. I was wondering about digital communication, though.
 
  • Like
Likes tionis
A neutrino beam could do the job. They aren't stopped by Faraday cages or RF blocking materials.
 
However, at this stage a neutrino beam can't transmit a significant amount of data. Is there anything that could?
 
Not that I'm aware of. But maybe others know. Good questions.
 
Theldiot said:
Hahaha That's embarrassing. I was wondering about digital communication, though.
Digital or analog has to do with your message encoding/decoding scheme, not the medium of transmission. You could certainly use acoustic waves digitally.
 
Theldiot said:
I was wondering about digital communication, though.
That's not a meaningful distinction - all communication is analog at the physical level.

For an example of sound used to carry digital data... Google for "acoustic coupler"... actually quite dangerous to use, as the buzzing sound of 110 bps traffic sounded enough like the distress cries of a wounded Diplodocus to attract the attention of any large carnivore in the area... I only narrowly escaped once when a raging T Rex tore my data shack apart in search of a meal.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda, russ_watters, Delta2 and 1 other person
Nugatory said:
That's not a meaningful distinction - all communication is analog at the physical level.

For an example of sound used to carry digital data... Google for "acoustic coupler"

That's incredibly interesting. Do you know the sound level acoustic couplers would make when they were used for cordless phones?
 
  • #10
Is electromagnetic radiation in the visible frequency range, i.e. light, acceptable? Modulating light to carry a digital signal is well-established technology.
 
  • #11
jtbell said:
Is electromagnetic radiation in the visible frequency range, i.e. light, acceptable? Modulating light to carry a digital signal is well-established technology.

I see. But visible light communication, I assume, would be completely blocked by opaque matter. Correct?

Would it be theoretically possible for quantum tunnelling to enable digital communication? And could this be used over long distances?
 
  • #12
Theldiot said:
Would it be theoretically possible for quantum tunnelling to enable digital communication? And could this be used over long distances?

Quantum tunneling is a random event. There is no way to know precisely when it's going to happen, though you can assign some probability to it.
 
  • #13
Dale said:
Digital or analog has to do with your message encoding/decoding scheme, not the medium of transmission. You could certainly use acoustic waves digitally.
Ahh, what's old is new again:
FanExpo2011-02-750.JPG


For those too young to remember, the thing on the left is called a "telephone" and the thing on the right is a "modem" - used for converting audio signals to data and back.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda, davenn, berkeman and 1 other person
  • #14
That's no phone! How do you text?

There were various methods of wireless signalling that do this: semaphore, Aldis lamps, etc.
 
  • #16
Vanadium 50 said:
semaphore, Aldis lamps, etc.
Native American smoke signals...
 
Back
Top