nobb123 said:
In fact, the article even claims that driving a Hummer does less harm to the environment than having a Prius.
The study on which this article is based is severely flawed.
Here's one example, they came up with an 'estimated lifetime' for all the vehicles in the study:
Toyata Prius - 109,000 miles
Honda Civic - 113,000 miles
Hummer H1 - 379,000 miles
(note - the prius comes with a 150k warranty -- so estimating less than that for the average lifetime is obviously flawed) There is no justification for these numbers in the report, but they use these lifetime numbers as the basis for a lot of their cost figures. So, the Hummer ends up comparing pretty well.
They also mention batteries - Toyota recycles 100% of their batteries, Honda recycles most of the battery (all the metals) and processes and safely disposes the rest (the plastic housing and cabling). Both companies put ~$200 bounties on the batteries to ensure they get turned in for recycling. And while nickel is certainly toxic, the lead in all of our lead/acid batteries is even more toxic.
Some other simple math will debunk this study. The average american drives ~12,500 miles annually. They claim that a prius costs $3.25/mile to drive. Do you know anyone spending over $40,000/year on their car?
I'm not trying to say that hybrids are perfect by any means. I'm only trying to point out the flaws of this particular study. Say what you will about hybrids, just don't use this study to back up your position.