Can You Determine the Correct Wavelength Measurement in Physics Class?

AI Thread Summary
In a physics class, students measured a wavelength using a microwave receiver and a reflective aluminum plate, calculating a distance of 18.5 = nλ, with the wavelength approximated at 2.8 cm. This led to a calculation of n as approximately 6.61, which raises the question of whether to round it to 7 or use the teacher's suggestion of 6.5. The choice between using the precise calculation or a simpler approximation depends on the context of the report. For precise measurements, 6.61 is more accurate, while 6.5 may be suitable for simplicity. Ultimately, the decision should be made collaboratively with the teacher.
bayan
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
hi guys, in our physics class today we were trying to get a more accurate length than the one stated on the device (2.8 cm).

We used a microwave reciever and a device that would detect maxima and minima (there was a aluminiun plate at the back which would reflect some wave.)


We foun the distance to be 18.5=n\lambda and we know that the wavelength is very close to 2.8cm

what I did is n=\frac{18.5}{2.8} which gave an answer of about 6.61.

Now the thing is Maxima accours with Constructive waves so would mean that I have to round it off to 7 right?

My teacher said that we have to make it as 6.5

which should I use? my guts and my brain or my teachers brains?

just for the record this measurement will be used for a written report!

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
!It really depends on the context of the report. If you are being asked for a precise measurement, you should use your calculation to get the exact answer of 6.61. However, if you are being asked to represent the measurement with a simpler approximation, then you can round it off to 6.5. It is ultimately up to you and your teacher to decide which option is best for your report.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top