Can You Prove This Fourier Transform Property?

dimensionless
Messages
460
Reaction score
1
Here's my problem:
Suppose that f is an integrable function. If \lambda \ne 0 is a real number and g(x) = f(\lambda x + y) proove that

<br /> G(k) = \frac{1}{\lambda} e^{ik/\lambda}F(\frac{k}{\lambda})<br />

Where F and G are the Fourier transforms of f and g, respectively.

I've got the Fourier transform of f(x) as

<br /> F(K) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(x) e^{-ikx} dx<br />

Likewise for g(x) I have

<br /> G(K) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty g(x) e^{-ikx} dx<br />

for F(K/lambda) I have

<br /> F(K/\lambda) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(\lambda x + y) e^{-ik(\lambda x + y)/\lambda} d(\lambda x + y)<br />

My guess is that the answer is relatively simple from here, but I'm not sure how to go about it. Does anyone understand this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dimensionless said:
Here's my problem:


I've got the Fourier transform of f(x) as

<br /> F(K) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(x) e^{-ikx} dx<br />

Likewise for g(x) I have

<br /> G(K) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty g(x) e^{-ikx} dx<br />

for F(K/lambda) I have

<br /> F(K/\lambda) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty f(\lambda x + y) e^{-ik(\lambda x + y)/\lambda} d(\lambda x + y)<br />
You should simply apply the defintion to g(x), so

G(k) = {1 \over {\sqrt{ 2 \pi}} } \int dx \,f(\lambda x + y) \, e^{-i kx}

Now, define a new variable x'= lambda x + y so that x=(x'-y)/lambda and dx= dx'/lambda.

You get

G(k) = { 1\over \lambda} {1 \over {\sqrt{ 2 \pi}}} \int \, dx&#039; \, f(x&#039;) \, e^{-i k x&#039;/ \lambda} e^{i k y / \lambda}

which directly gives the result you were looking for (I am asusming there was typo in the fomula you gave and that the y was missing in the exponent).

Patrick
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top