Can you show me if i did these calculations right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter graphicer89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculations
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the energy required to boil one gram of mercury and one gram of water, starting from room temperature. The calculations for mercury yield a total energy requirement of 75.05 calories, while the calculations for water result in 618 calories. Participants confirm that the calculations appear correct, although there was an initial inconsistency regarding the energy of vaporization for water, which was clarified to be 540 calories. Ultimately, it is concluded that more energy is required to boil a gram of water compared to a gram of mercury. The calculations and methods used are validated by the participants.
graphicer89
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The specific heat of mercury is .03 cal/g C and its boiling point is 357 C. The specific heat of water is 1 cal/g C. It takes 65 calories of energy to vaporize one gram of mercury and 540*(edit) calories to vaporize 1 gram of water. If both substances begin at room temperature ( about 22 C) does it take more energy to boil a gram of mercury or a gram of water? Show your calculations.


Mercury Calculations:


Water calculations:


The Attempt at a Solution




I will just go straight to the trying to solve it out...

Mercury Calculations...

1 x .03 x ( 357-22) +65 = energy required for mercury
1 x .03 x 335 + 65
1 x 10.05 + 65 =
75.05 ...did i do this right?? by your calculations?


Water Calculations:

1 x 1 x (100 -22) + 540 = energy required for water
1 x 1 x 78 + 540
78+540 =
618 = cal energy required for water...So did i do both right ...
...so basically it required more energy to boil a gram of water...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The 540 for energy of vaporization of water is not consistent with what is given in your problem (430). Aside from that, the calculations seem alright.
 
cepheid said:
The 540 for energy of vaporization of water is not consistent with what is given in your problem (430). Aside from that, the calculations seem alright.

Your completely right cepheid i messed up ...instead of 430 it should had been 540 ...but does it seem right? now that its 540?
 
As far as I can see, your calculations look fine. I don't see any obvious errors with the method or with the arithmetic.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top