Can You Solve This Challenging IITJEE Physics Problem in Under 30 Minutes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nirav Chavda
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a challenging IITJEE physics problem involving a point object moving in a circular path and a man moving along the y-axis. The problem requires finding the linear momentum of the object with respect to the man as a function of time. Participants express the difficulty of solving the problem within 30 minutes, with some suggesting it may take longer for IIT aspirants. The problem emphasizes the need for a non-relativistic approach to transform momentum into the specified moving frame. Engaging with this question is seen as a test of physics problem-solving skills relevant to IITJEE preparation.
Nirav Chavda
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
damn!... it took me a total of 30 minutes to solve this problem... too much for an IITian.
Anywayz.. i would like to give this question to you, if you solve it within 30 minutes you're Great!
If within 45 minutes, you're just fit for an IIT entrance exam.
just try it.

question- a point object of mass m, moving in a circular path of radius "r" with a uniform speed v1 is at x at t=0. at the same time a man starts moving with uniform speed v2 along y-axis from origin .
Find the linear momentum of the object with respect to the man as a function of time.

note- here x is any point lying on the x-axis such that it is the point lying on the circle. here the circular path is inscribed between "x" and the origin and lies on x-axis. so you can count r= x/2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems straightforwards - find the momentum in the problem statement frame, then transform it to the specified moving frame. I assume this is non-relativistic, so you'd use the non-relativistic transform rathre than a Lorentz boost.

What approach did you use? Maybe you should pretend you didn't actually solve the problem and post this to Homework help...
 
This is 2003 Physics IITJEE question,i believe.!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top