Can You Solve this Complex Equation Derived from a Gambling Strategy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rishijin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    gambling Strategy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a complex equation derived from a gambling strategy, expressed as Y = (X * 2 + 1) + ((X * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) and its simplifications. The original poster struggles with algebraic shortcuts and seeks assistance to find the value of X. Respondents suggest possible simplified forms of the equation, indicating it could be either Y = 31X + 26 or Y = 30X + 27. There is also a query regarding the relevance of the equation to gambling strategies. The conversation highlights the challenges of algebraic simplification and its application in gambling contexts.
Rishijin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am just no good at math these days and I was wondering if someone could solve this equation that I derived from a popular gambling strategy. I would definitely save time for me if I knew X. I suppose it isn't that I'm bad at math, as I have a natural talent for it, but I don't remember any algebraic shortcuts on simplification, so this would take me a while. Thanks to anyone who helps!

Y = (X * 2 + 1) + (( X * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) + ((( X * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) + (((( X * 2 + 1 ) * 2 + 1 ) * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Y=30x+26 It is just simple algebra I believe.
 
Rishijin said:
I am just no good at math these days and I was wondering if someone could solve this equation that I derived from a popular gambling strategy. I would definitely save time for me if I knew X. I suppose it isn't that I'm bad at math, as I have a natural talent for it, but I don't remember any algebraic shortcuts on simplification, so this would take me a while. Thanks to anyone who helps!

Y = (X * 2 + 1) + (( X * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) + ((( X * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1) + (((( X * 2 + 1 ) * 2 + 1 ) * 2 + 1) * 2 + 1)


Is it possible that you are using "X*2+ 1" to mean X2+ 1?
 
I think it is either y = 31x +26 or y = 30x + 27.

Either way, thanks for simplifying it for me.
 
Rishijin: I think it is either y = 31x +26 or y = 30x + 27.


Might I ask, what does it have to do with gambling?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top