Can Young's modulus be applied to slinky springs?

AI Thread Summary
Young's modulus can be applied to slinky springs, but its application is more complex than for a simple rod due to the shear deformation involved. The spring constant can be expressed in terms of Young's modulus, the Poisson ratio, and the helix angle of the spring. Analyzing the deformation requires understanding the kinematics of shear between wire cross-sections rather than just tensile stress. Failure analysis is also necessary to determine the conditions under which the wire may fail due to shear stress. Overall, a detailed strength of materials approach is essential for accurate calculations regarding slinky springs.
hulk78
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Could somebody please tell me if we can apply young modulus theory to a slinky spring, or can only be applied to a rod when strenched?If possible to apply to the slinky spring, how can we calculate the elasticity of that slinky spring?by the way what is the process by which slinky springs are manufactured?(do they compress a thin metal wire in such a way that it always compresses)
Thanks in advanced
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hulk78 said:
Could somebody please tell me if we can apply young modulus theory to a slinky spring, or can only be applied to a rod when strenched?If possible to apply to the slinky spring, how can we calculate the elasticity of that slinky spring?by the way what is the process by which slinky springs are manufactured?(do they compress a thin metal wire in such a way that it always compresses)
Thanks in advanced

Yes. Hooke's law of stress and strain can be applied to express the spring constant of a spring in terms of Young's modulus, the Poisson ratio, and the helix angle in the undeformed state. The basic deformation kinematics is one of shear (twist) at each cross section of the wire. This problem can be analyzed using a strength of materials approach, and does not require a theory of elasticity solution.
 
Chestermiller said:
Yes. Hooke's law of stress and strain can be applied to express the spring constant of a spring in terms of Young's modulus, the Poisson ratio, and the helix angle in the undeformed state. The basic deformation kinematics is one of shear (twist) at each cross section of the wire. This problem can be analyzed using a strength of materials approach, and does not require a theory of elasticity solution.

So based on what you said, can I say that we can apply the Young's modulus to the material of the slinky spring itself and therefore we can see in this graph http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Metal_yield.svg
that as the limit E tends to 0 the spring gets damaged?
 
hulk78 said:
So based on what you said, can I say that we can apply the Young's modulus to the material of the slinky spring itself and therefore we can see in this graph http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Metal_yield.svg
that as the limit E tends to 0 the spring gets damaged?
No. It's much more complicated than that. First of all, as I said, the basic deformation is not tensile. It is shear between adjacent cross sections of the wire. To figure this problem out, you need to go through an analysis of the kinematics of the deformation, and see how the shear of the cross sections translates geometrically into an axial extension of the helical spring. Then, you also need to go through a failure analysis to determine at what extension, the shear stress is high enough to cause failure of the wire. I've seen an analysis of this problem in a strength of materials book by a guy named Faupel, but I'm not sure whether the book is still in print. Try some Googles to see if you can find an analysis on line.

Chet
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top