Can Zero Potential be Defined at Any Point in Electric Potential?

AI Thread Summary
Electric potential can be defined as zero at any point, provided there is no point charge at that location. While it is common to set the potential at infinity to zero, this is merely a convention and not a strict requirement. Choosing a different reference point may yield different numerical results, but it remains valid as long as the approach is consistent. However, defining zero potential at the location of a point charge leads to undefined or nonsensical results. Ultimately, the concept of electric potential is relative and depends on the chosen reference point.
fredrogers3
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



My question is one of clarification about electric potential.

Homework Equations


See Below


The Attempt at a Solution


I understand that when electric potential is defined at infinity to be zero for a series of point charges, the potential is simply kq/r. My question is is it possible to define zero to be at the origin, and if so what would the new expression be. It would seem that the integral would yield a 1/0 term which would be undefined.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can define the potential to be 0 at any place you want, assuming that there is not a point charge at that particular location.

Electric potential always assumes potential difference, meaning that the potential at one point is always in reference to some other point.

Assigning 0 Volts at infinity (meaning infinity is the reference potential) is merely a convention, not a hard and fast rule.

If you choose some other place besides infinity as the 0 potential, you might get different numerical answers to the particular problem than the answers your textbook gives. But it's still valid for you to do that for your own purposes, as long as you are self consistent.

But as you've implied, don't define the reference potential at the very location where a point charge resides. You'll get a nonsensical answer.

But that's really no different from the situation where you define infinity as the location of 0 V and then try to find the potential at the very location where a point charge resides. In that situation you'll also get a nonsensical answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top