Cancel secondary flux (reaction) from transformer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of canceling secondary flux in transformers to maintain a constant primary current while extracting energy from the secondary. Two transformers are proposed, one with a 0° phase and the other with a 180° phase, to achieve this cancellation effect. The idea suggests using multiple transformers arranged geometrically to negate the flux, but the feasibility and practicality of this approach are questioned. Participants emphasize that to effectively reduce the magnetic field, one could wrap the windings to ensure zero current in the enclosed area. Overall, the concept faces skepticism regarding its ability to create energy without violating fundamental principles.
lba
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
hi,

The drawing show 2 transformers T1 and T2. Each primary of transformer is at fixed voltage (110 volt for example), but one transformer is with 0° phase and other with 180° phase. The secondary of each transformer has the same charge and the same current. The idea is to cancel the flux from secondaries. We put in front of each part of secondary an other secondary but with +180° phase like this all secondary is in front of reverse flux. When one give N/S, it is in front of S/N. Like that all flux from each turn of coil is cancel. Sure, this need to put a lot of transformer for cancel all the flux and use a particular geometric shape. But if we think with 5 transformers: 4 transformers for cancel the flux of one (4 sides), is the flux is cancel for the central transformer ?

The iron of each transfomer is always separated by other transformer.

What's wrong with this idea ?

Thanks
LBA
 

Attachments

  • 5t.JPG
    5t.JPG
    26.6 KB · Views: 520
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To cancel the B field just wrap the windings so that the current enclosed is zero in your amerpian loop.
 
To cancel the B field just wrap the windings so that the current enclosed is zero in your amerpian loop.

thanks for your message ;)
I don't understand all... I want a current in the primary coil in each transformer, because I want current in the secondary. When I take current from secondary, the flux from secondary decrease flux from the primary and this increase the current in primary because the voltage is constant. I would like to suppress this increase of current in primary, so I try to cancel flux from secondary and like that this system can create energy (I know it's not possible ;). I don't find what's wrong with this idea ?

Have a good day
LBA
 
All I am saying is that if you want to cut down the B field in a certain region, Just have a wire going in the opposite direction to cut down down the current enclosed.
I am still not sure exactly what your trying to do, but you could also use an external source to do this. To get it where you want it.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top