Cancel secondary flux (reaction) from transformer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of canceling secondary flux in transformers to maintain a constant primary current while extracting energy from the secondary. Two transformers are proposed, one with a 0° phase and the other with a 180° phase, to achieve this cancellation effect. The idea suggests using multiple transformers arranged geometrically to negate the flux, but the feasibility and practicality of this approach are questioned. Participants emphasize that to effectively reduce the magnetic field, one could wrap the windings to ensure zero current in the enclosed area. Overall, the concept faces skepticism regarding its ability to create energy without violating fundamental principles.
lba
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
hi,

The drawing show 2 transformers T1 and T2. Each primary of transformer is at fixed voltage (110 volt for example), but one transformer is with 0° phase and other with 180° phase. The secondary of each transformer has the same charge and the same current. The idea is to cancel the flux from secondaries. We put in front of each part of secondary an other secondary but with +180° phase like this all secondary is in front of reverse flux. When one give N/S, it is in front of S/N. Like that all flux from each turn of coil is cancel. Sure, this need to put a lot of transformer for cancel all the flux and use a particular geometric shape. But if we think with 5 transformers: 4 transformers for cancel the flux of one (4 sides), is the flux is cancel for the central transformer ?

The iron of each transfomer is always separated by other transformer.

What's wrong with this idea ?

Thanks
LBA
 

Attachments

  • 5t.JPG
    5t.JPG
    26.6 KB · Views: 523
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To cancel the B field just wrap the windings so that the current enclosed is zero in your amerpian loop.
 
To cancel the B field just wrap the windings so that the current enclosed is zero in your amerpian loop.

thanks for your message ;)
I don't understand all... I want a current in the primary coil in each transformer, because I want current in the secondary. When I take current from secondary, the flux from secondary decrease flux from the primary and this increase the current in primary because the voltage is constant. I would like to suppress this increase of current in primary, so I try to cancel flux from secondary and like that this system can create energy (I know it's not possible ;). I don't find what's wrong with this idea ?

Have a good day
LBA
 
All I am saying is that if you want to cut down the B field in a certain region, Just have a wire going in the opposite direction to cut down down the current enclosed.
I am still not sure exactly what your trying to do, but you could also use an external source to do this. To get it where you want it.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top