Cannon Ball in Space: What Happens & How Much Does It Hurt?

AI Thread Summary
A cannonball shot in space would not experience air resistance, allowing it to maintain its speed indefinitely until it impacts an object. The lack of atmosphere means that the impact force would be the same as on Earth, but the absence of gravity would affect the trajectory. Pain from a cannonball impact would be severe regardless of location, as the injury would be due to the force of the impact rather than environmental factors. The discussion highlights that while the physical effects of the impact remain consistent, the experience of pain could differ based on the context of the environment. Ultimately, the fundamental danger of being hit by a cannonball remains unchanged in both scenarios.
air-in
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
What would happen if you were shot with a cannon ball in space? How badly do you reckon it would hurt, compared to if you were shot with the same cannon ball on Earth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think there should be any appreciable difference?
 
Why do you think it might be different?

[EDIT] D'oh!
 
LOL ... "snap" is the operative word ;)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top