Cannon Hits Cliff: Calculating Minimum Muzzle Velocity & Distance Past Edge

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yahaira.Reyes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cannon
AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum muzzle velocity for a cannon to clear a 25.0 m cliff from 60 m away, the mass of the shell is irrelevant. The initial velocity can be broken down into x and y components using trigonometric functions based on the launch angle. Time can be expressed as a function of horizontal distance, allowing for substitution into the vertical motion equation. By setting the equations for the projectile's height and distance, the necessary velocity can be calculated. This approach effectively combines the horizontal and vertical motion to solve the problem.
Yahaira.Reyes
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A connon, located 60 m from the base of a vertical 25.0m tall clift, shoots a 15 kg shell at 43.0 degrees above the horizontal toward the cliff.

A) what must the minimum muzzle velocity be for the shell to clear the top of the cliff?
B) The ground at the top of the cliff is level, with a constant elevation of 25.0 m above the cannon. Under the conditions of part (A), how far does the shell past the edge of the cliff?

x=x0 + V0t
Vy= v0y-gt
y=y0+v0yt-1/2gt^2
vf^2=vi^2-2ax

I am a little throw off by the kg of the shell. I do not know how to start the prob.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As is always the case with "gravity" problems, the mass of the shell is irrelevant. Ignore it. Use precisely the equations you have with one addition: If V0 is the initial muzzle velocity, then the x-component is VO cos(43) and the y-component is VO sin(43).
 
wouldn't I need to calculate the time ? All of the equations require time.
 
Yahaira.Reyes said:
wouldn't I need to calculate the time ? All of the equations require time.

no, you can put time in function of x, and then substitute in equation of y, getting y in funtion of x.

that gives the y coordinate in respect with x. with x=60 and y=25,you know that there will be a velocity V0 needed.(this after you've done the cos/sin thing HallsofIvy told and well.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top