Canoeist Weight Distribution: How Far Can He Reach Without Getting Wet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gtaylorMD
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A 56kg canoeist in a 23kg canoe attempts to reach a dock from the front of a 2.3m long canoe. The discussion centers on whether he can do this without getting wet, considering the principles of conservation of momentum. As he moves forward, the canoe will shift backward, affecting his ability to reach the dock. The center of mass remains stationary, indicating that his movement will result in the canoe moving away from the dock. Therefore, without precise calculations, it is unlikely he can reach the dock without getting wet.
gtaylorMD
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A 56kg canoeist sits at rest at the back end of a 23kg canoe. The canoe is at rest in still water with its front end about 0.50m from the dock. He realizes that he left his paddle on the dock, so he carefully works his way to the front of the 2.3m long canoe. Is he likely to reach the dock from the front of the canoe (without getting wet)? Explain with some estimates

I am completely confused on this one, I believe he can make it without getting wet but I cannot seem to accurately prove that. Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like conservation of momentum problem. Which means the center of mass won't move since the initial momentum was zero.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Thread 'Struggle to understand the concept of the question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

How Can a Ship Safely Brake in Space Without Crushing Its Inhabitants?
2
Replies
90
Views
10K
How Can I Calculate Displacements and Speeds for My Physics Exam?
Replies
11
Views
6K
Can Evolved State: Dichotomy Capture Your Imagination?
Replies
1
Views
4K
Who is the Killer at the Beach Barbecue?
Replies
9
Views
5K
Drag can happen in extremely low-viscosity fluids
Replies
7
Views
4K
PF Fan Fiction: Mathematicians in Love
Replies
2
Views
4K
News Gusher of Lies: The Dangerous Delusions of Energy Independence
3
Replies
133
Views
27K
Do Movies Teach Us Realistic Life Skills?
Replies
1
Views
10K
Are West Jet Airlines Flight Attendants the Funniest in the Industry?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Futility of self-pride and indignation
Replies
27
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top