Capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor with two dielectrics

AI Thread Summary
A parallel plate capacitor filled with two dielectrics of equal thickness and different dielectric constants can be analyzed by treating it as two capacitors in series. The capacitance for each section is calculated using the formula C = kε₀A/d, where k is the dielectric constant, ε₀ is the permittivity of free space, A is the area, and d is the separation. The total capacitance can be derived from the individual capacitances, leading to the equation Ct = (2ε₀Ak₁k₂)/(d(k₁ + k₂)). This method of splitting the capacitor into two series components is valid and provides the correct capacitance for the system. Understanding this approach is crucial for solving similar electromagnetic problems effectively.
iamaelephant
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Capacitor with 2 dielectrics

Homework Statement


A parallel plate capacitor of plate area A and spacing d is filled with two parallel slabs of dielectric of equal thickness with dielectric constants k1 and k2, respectively. What is the capacitance?

Homework Equations


You tell me.

The Attempt at a Solution


I wasn't sure if I could do something simple like take an average of the dielectric constants (although I suspect not). Instead I split the capacitor into two series capacitors and added them in the usual way. Is this allowed? Off the top of my head it seems to be okay, but I'm probably wrong.

In any case, here is my working. This electromagnetic stuff is definitely my weak hand so advice on these types of problems would be great.

Splitting the capacitor into two series capacitors, we can get their capacitances using the equation
<br /> C_1 = \frac{k_1 \epsilon_0 A}{\frac{d}{2}}<br /> = \frac{2k_1 \epsilon_0 A}{d}<br />
<br /> C_2 = \frac{k_2 \epsilon_0 A}{\frac{d}{2}}<br /> = \frac{2k_2 \epsilon_0 A}{d}<br />

\frac{1}{C_t} = \frac{1}{C_1} + \frac{1}{C_2} = \frac{d}{2 k_1 \epsilon_0 A} + \frac{d}{2 k_2 \epsilon_0 A}<br /> = \frac{2 d \epsilon_0 A (k_1 + k_2)}{(2 k_1 \epsilon_0 A)(2 k_2 \epsilon_0 A)}<br />

C_t = \frac{2 \epsilon_0 A k_1 k_2}{d(k_1 + k_2}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the correct way to go about the problem. The capacitor filled with two dielectrics can be considered to be two capacitors in series with different dielectrics.
 
Excellent, thanks so much. I'm stoked I got this one right, a rare hit for me in EM :P
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top