Capacitance of a system of 3 concentric spheres

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the capacitance of a system of three concentric conducting spheres with radii a, b, and c, held at potentials of 0, V, and 0, respectively. The user has derived the electric fields and charges on each sphere, noting that the total charge sums to zero. They express confusion regarding the concept of "total capacitance" and its relation to individual capacitances. It is clarified that the total capacitance of the system can be determined by summing the individual capacitances of each sphere, with the formula Ctotal = 4πε0(a + b + c). This topic is relevant for understanding introductory electromagnetism concepts.
Anthony
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
1. 3 conducting spheres of radius a, b, c (a<b<c) are held at a potential of 0, V, 0 respectively. What is the capacitance of the system?

2. Q=CV (which I assume extends to Qi=CijVj for multiple conductors).

3. I've calculated the fields in the two interesting regions, calculated the charge on each sphere - this gives Qa+Qb+Qc=0.

I can't find many references to the "total capacitance" of a system of conductors and how it would relate to my Cij. I might be missing the totally obvious, but that'll be down to my utter incompetence when it comes to physics!

Thanks for shedding any light on the matter. It shouldn't be too difficult, because the question comes from an undergraduate example sheet on introductory EM.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The total capacitance of the system is equal to the sum of the individual capacitances of each sphere. The capacitance of a single isolated spherical conductor is given by C = 4πε0a,where a is the radius of the sphere and ε0 is the permittivity of free space. Therefore, the total capacitance of the system is given byCtotal = 4πε0(a + b + c).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top