Capacitor and resistor in a flowing liquid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a parallel-plate capacitor immersed in a conducting liquid moving through a magnetic field, raising questions about the power generated in an external resistor connected to the capacitor. Participants explore how the magnetic field influences the movement of charges in the liquid, suggesting that it creates a voltage difference between the plates, leading to current flow through the resistor. There is uncertainty about the effects of leakage current through the liquid and whether it should be considered in calculations. The conversation also touches on the balance of forces between the electric and magnetic fields, which may affect the trajectory of the charges. Overall, the problem is recognized as complex and intriguing, with participants eager to delve deeper into the physics involved.
Saketh
Messages
258
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A parallel-plate capacitor with cross-sectional area S and plate separation d is put into a stream of conducting liquid with resistivity \rho. The liquid moves parallel to the plates with a constant velocity v, and the whole system is located in a uniform magnetic field of induction B, vector \textbf{B} being parallel to the plates and perpendicular to the stream direction. The capacitor plates are interconnected by means of an external resistance R. What amount of power is generated in that resistance?

Homework Equations



\rho J = E
Maxwell's equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no intuitive grasp of what's going on in this problem. My first guess was that the charges in the fluid are being pushed by the magnetic field, but what does that have to do with the current flowing through the resistor? I'm not sure why current is flowing through the resistor at all.

I can't really show work because I'm not sure where to start. Once I figure out what's going on, I can do the rest of this problem myself.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Cool question. It's related to the field of magnetohydrodynamics:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamics

You are correct that the moving charges in the fluid will experience a force perpendicular to the magnetic field. This will effectively pump charges from one capacitor plate to the other, which will create a voltage which causes a current through the external resistor.

So if you can calculate what the plate-to-plate flux of charges is due to the force from the magnetic field, then you will be able to calculate the current flow through the resistor. The only thing I'm not sure about is whether you need to also account for a reverse leakage current back through the conductive liquid (as appearing like another resistor in parallel with the explicit load resistor)... I'm not sure about that aspect without giving it more thought.
 
So if you can calculate what the plate-to-plate flux of charges is due to the force from the magnetic field, then you will be able to calculate the current flow through the resistor.
If the magnetic field is exerting a force on the charges, I thought that the fluid would be moving upwards, in which case it would not be moving parallel to the plates as said earlier.

This confuses me. How can the charges move from one plate to the other when the magnetic force will push them in an arc?
The only thing I'm not sure about is whether you need to also account for a reverse leakage current back through the conductive liquid (as appearing like another resistor in parallel with the explicit load resistor)... I'm not sure about that aspect without giving it more thought.
My guess is that the resistance of the liquid is negligible because it acts as a "current source" instead of a pure "voltage source." But I am the one who's confused about this question, so take that with a grain of salt.
 
The "conducting liquid" is flowing straight through the capacitor, I would think, under the influence of some hydraulic pressure source. The fact that the free conductors in the fluid are experiencing forces orthogonal to the fluid flow should not alter the fluid's direction substantially. The fluid flowing is what moves the conductors along perpendicular to the B field, which is what imparts a force on them to make them tend to flow from plate-to-plate.

I guess I'd start by ignoring the fluid aspect of the question, and just think about the charges as being free and flowing in a stream. I'd just think about the electrons and ignore the fact that there are matching protons somewhere in the soup to keep everything electrically neutral.

I'm not sure about the next steps, but I think I would assume that a voltage difference develops across the plates, which generates an opposing E field to the B field Lorentz force, in order for the current flow to reach equilibrium. I think that it is the balance between the E and B field forces on the electrons which will result in a steady upward motion of the electrons instead of a curved trajectory like they would follow in the absence of the capacitor plates.

Maybe explore that angle some -- see if you can get to where the electrons are traveling upward at some angle, and calculate the net flux of electrons between the plates from that. Fun problem.
 
Maybe explore that angle some -- see if you can get to where the electrons are traveling upward at some angle, and calculate the net flux of electrons between the plates from that. Fun problem.
Yes, it is a fun problem. It's from the Irodov book -- 3.265, to be exact.

I'll think about it more tomorrow, and report back if I have any breakthroughs.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top