Capacitors charged to voltage in parallel

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of two capacitors with different initial voltages when connected in parallel. One capacitor has capacitance C charged to voltage V, and the other has the same capacitance C charged to voltage 2V. Participants explore the implications of connecting these capacitors in parallel and how the charge redistributes to achieve a common voltage.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion regarding the differences between parallel and series connections, particularly in terms of charge and voltage behavior. They discuss the need to calculate the charge on each capacitor and how to approach the redistribution of charge when connected in parallel.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on calculating the charge on each capacitor and emphasized the importance of recognizing that components in parallel must have the same voltage. There is an ongoing exploration of how to distribute the total charge and the implications of equal capacitance on the resulting voltage.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem uses symbolic values for capacitance and voltage, which adds complexity to their calculations. There is also mention of potential errors in algebraic manipulations, highlighting the need for careful consideration of the relationships between charge, voltage, and capacitance.

Ineedahero
Messages
22
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Suppose you have a capacitor with capacitance C charged to voltage V and a second capacitor with capacitance C charged to voltage 2V. The two capacitors are connected in parallel. What will be the voltage across the two capacitors after being connected in parallel?

Homework Equations


Q = CV

The Attempt at a Solution


These kinds of questions confuse the hell out of me.

What does it have to do with a parallel connection? What's the difference if it was in series?

I know that for a parallel connection, the charge is constant throughout, and for a series connection the voltage is constant throughout...but what does that really mean? How do you apply it?

I really see no possible way to solve this, but at the same time I feel like it's simple.

What are you supposed to do here??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ineedahero said:

Homework Statement


Suppose you have a capacitor with capacitance C charged to voltage V and a second capacitor with capacitance C charged to voltage 2V. The two capacitors are connected in parallel. What will be the voltage across the two capacitors after being connected in parallel?


Homework Equations


Q = CV


The Attempt at a Solution


These kinds of questions confuse the hell out of me.

What does it have to do with a parallel connection? What's the difference if it was in series?

I know that for a parallel connection, the charge is constant throughout, and for a series connection the voltage is constant throughout...but what does that really mean? How do you apply it?
That's exactly backwards: Components in parallel must experience the same potential difference across them (since their connections share the same pair of nodes). Components in series share the same current (since there's nowhere for it to go except follow the single path through them).

Here you've got two charged capacitors with different voltages on them being connected together in parallel. The charges on these capacitors will have to redistribute in order to achieve the same voltage across both (parallel --> same potential difference). Charge is a conserved quantity.

So start by working out the charge on each (symbolically). How will you distribute the total charge so that the capacitors will have the same potential difference?
 
Before we leave this problem, just for fun, calculate the energy stored in the two capacitors before connecting them together and the energy stored in the capacitors after connecting them in parallel. Where did the energy go?
 
gneill said:
That's exactly backwards: Components in parallel must experience the same potential difference across them (since their connections share the same pair of nodes). Components in series share the same current (since there's nowhere for it to go except follow the single path through them).

Here you've got two charged capacitors with different voltages on them being connected together in parallel. The charges on these capacitors will have to redistribute in order to achieve the same voltage across both (parallel --> same potential difference). Charge is a conserved quantity.

So start by working out the charge on each (symbolically). How will you distribute the total charge so that the capacitors will have the same potential difference?

Thanks for the help!

Here's where I'm getting stuck - you say to work out the charge on each. Well, how do I calculate the charge??

I know that q = cv. I also have, essentially, two capacitors connected in series - once I find the equivalent capacitance of the two capacitors connected in parallel.

So that leaves me with two capacitors of 14 connected in series. I know that the charge is constant throughout both of them...but how do I find it??

q=cv = 14 * 12 = 168...but what if the capacitors weren't of equal capacitance? Then that formula wouldn't work...
 
Ineedahero said:
Thanks for the help!

Here's where I'm getting stuck - you say to work out the charge on each. Well, how do I calculate the charge??

I know that q = cv. I also have, essentially, two capacitors connected in series - once I find the equivalent capacitance of the two capacitors connected in parallel.
Don't get ahead of yourself :smile: Start by finding the charge on each capacitor before they are connected to each other. What's the total?
So that leaves me with two capacitors of 14 connected in series. I know that the charge is constant throughout both of them...but how do I find it??

q=cv = 14 * 12 = 168...but what if the capacitors weren't of equal capacitance? Then that formula wouldn't work...

I don't know where these numbers are coming from; the problem only uses symbolic values (C,V).

Also, while you can interpret two components connected together to be either in series or in parallel, in this sort of problem you'll find it easier to interpret the connection in parallel fashion. This is because you can make use of the equal potential difference criteria of parallel connections and the equation you already have for the potential across a capacitor (V = q/C).

If the capacitances were not equal then you'd need to write a pair of equations and solve for the individual charges; the total charge being a constant and potentials across them being equal.
 
gneill said:
Don't get ahead of yourself :smile: Start by finding the charge on each capacitor before they are connected to each other. What's the total?
Hmm

Q1 = C1V1
Q2 = C1*2V1

Q1 + Q2 = 2C1*3V1

Is that correct?
 
Right idea, but check your algebra.
 
Of course, what a silly error!

Q = 3C1V1
 
Ineedahero said:
Of course, what a silly error!

Q = 3C1V1

Okay, that looks better. So now, how will that charge be distributed on the two (equal) capacitors when they are connected in parallel?
 
  • #10
Well, since the voltage is constant (since they're in parallel), and the capacitances are equal, the charges must also be equal.

So the charge will be cut exactly in half and go to each capacitor?
 
  • #11
Ineedahero said:
Well, since the voltage is constant (since they're in parallel), and the capacitances are equal, the charges must also be equal.

So the charge will be cut exactly in half and go to each capacitor?

That's correct. So what's the resulting voltage on one of the capacitors?
 
  • #12
Hmm

Qeach = 1.5*C1V1

The capacitance doesn't change, but the voltage does.

Qeach = C1V2

1.5V1 = V2

So the new voltage is 1.5 * the original voltage?
 
  • #13
Yup.
 
  • #14
Ok!

Thanks a lot for the help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K