Capacitors connected in parallel

AI Thread Summary
When capacitors C1 and C2 are connected in parallel and a potential difference is applied, the equivalent capacitor has the same potential difference. The charge on the equivalent capacitor equals the sum of the charges on C1 and C2. This is based on the definition of capacitance and the principle of charge conservation. Understanding these concepts clarifies the relationship between the charges in parallel configurations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of grasping capacitance definitions to solve related problems effectively.
nautica
Capacitor C1 and C2 are connected in parallel and a potential difference is applied to the combination. If the capacitor that is equilvalent to the combination has the same potential difference, then the charge on the equivalent capacitor is the same as?

a) the charge on C1
b) the sum of the charges on C1 and C2
c) the difference of the charges on C1 and C2
d) the product of the charges on C1 and C2
e) none of above

I got lost in the wording on this one.

nautica
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's see if I can walk you through this.

Give me an equation that expresses the definition of capacitance...

Next, what is the "formula" for CEQ when several capacitors C1, C2, C3 ... are connected in parallel?
 
Last edited:
The sum of the charges on C1 and C2

thanks
nautica
 
First ask yourself, "what is the definition of capacitance?" That should probably give you a huge hint. The next hint would be charge conservation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top