Car Batteries, and how they're connected

  • Thread starter Thread starter dhong089
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Batteries Car
AI Thread Summary
Car batteries supply power to various components in vehicles, primarily through a connection to the car's metal frame, which acts as a conductor. The negative terminal connects to the frame, allowing components like the radio and blower motor to receive power without needing extensive wiring. Insulation is typically used in wiring to protect against damage and prevent short circuits, but the frame's design minimizes the need for additional wires. External elements like water do not affect the electrical circuit since they are not part of it. This efficient design reduces complexity while maintaining safety and functionality in automotive electrical systems.
dhong089
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This is an automotive-related question, but I’m sure any of you guys can answer it.

The car battery is a significant part that supplies lots of power to various components of the car.

I always thought that the battery would be connected to various connectors in order to supply the power. Basically I thought there would be lots of wires running from the battery to the components. However, the negative terminal of the battery is simply attached to the frame of the car itself. Thus when the battery begins to let the electrons flow, I presume the car-components (radio, blower motor, fan, etc) receive their power from the frame, via the battery.

How wild! I never imagined that cars operated like this! Ever! I would've never guessed that the "frame" of the car would act like a conductor wire. Can someone explain how this works? Shouldn't there be an insulator to prevent the electrons from escaping, just like wires using insulators? I mean, if water or something touches the frame, wouldn’t it be dangerous? The process just seems so “primitive,” yet advanced at the same time. I had a bit of a mind explosion today when I removed my battery from my car today.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
dhong089 said:
This is an automotive-related question, but I’m sure any of you guys can answer it.

The car battery is a significant part that supplies lots of power to various components of the car.

I always thought that the battery would be connected to various connectors in order to supply the power. Basically I thought there would be lots of wires running from the battery to the components. However, the negative terminal of the battery is simply attached to the frame of the car itself. Thus when the battery begins to let the electrons flow, I presume the car-components (radio, blower motor, fan, etc) receive their power from the frame, via the battery.

How wild! I never imagined that cars operated like this! Ever! I would've never guessed that the "frame" of the car would act like a conductor wire. Can someone explain how this works? Shouldn't there be an insulator to prevent the electrons from escaping, just like wires using insulators? I mean, if water or something touches the frame, wouldn’t it be dangerous? The process just seems so “primitive,” yet advanced at the same time. I had a bit of a mind explosion today when I removed my battery from my car today.
The frame is metal. Metal conducts. That answers one of the frame questions.

Electrons don't "leak" out of wires very easily. There are three mains reasons (that I can think of off the top of my head) for wires to have insulation:

1) Protect the conductor from damage/corrosion/other negative effects.

2) Prevent bare wires from touching each other and shorting out

3) Protect you from being hurt by shock.

With a few exceptions (things get really weird at really high frequencies), electricity needs a complete path from one end of the source to the other in order to flow.

Water or trees outside of the car are not part of the electrical circuit, so just touching the car won't affect it at all.

Having the frame as a common connecting point for all the electronics cuts down on the amount of wires that need to be run around it. All of the electronics need to be connected to the + and - of the battery in some way, and connecting the - to the frame and having everything else connect to that cuts the amount of wires that need to be run to the battery in half. They still need to the connected to the + side though.

And before you ask, connecting the + side to the frame would work just as well, if the car was designed for that setup. The only reason the - side is connected is because that is what is commonly connected to "ground" in electrical schematics, and it's a really good idea to keep the setup the same in all cars.
 
Shouldn't there be an insulator to prevent the electrons from escaping, just like wires using insulators?

You mean like a colored insulating chemical sprayed on the outside surface of the chassis?
 
Zryn said:
You mean like a colored insulating chemical sprayed on the outside surface of the chassis?
Ha ha, that's a good point, I didn't even catch that. Funny how you miss the obvious sometimes.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
77
Views
8K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top