Car that can you drive forever

[raruba]

Hello , this is my first post.

I just had this crazy idea if you can make a car that you can drive forever. I just want to check if this is possible.

I know that the "motor powers the generator and generator powers the motor" thing doesn't work. Cause it isn't 100% efficient and bla bla bla. But what if you still do this and let's say that you can get 80% back. So that the motor powers the generator and the generator powers the motor back by 80% and that the other 20% you power with solar panels.

So my question is will this work and if not why will it not work ?

 

[Bystander]

What keeps you from lifting yourself by your bootstraps?

 

[jedishrfu]

Your idea is the basis of many solar cars today. They collect solar energy, charge a battery for cloudy times and drive a motor. Some vehicles might even run the generator when braking to recapture some kinetic energy.

So its a great idea but like so many great ideas someone has thought of it before.

 

[BvU]

But the solar panel thing is a good idea. they race 3000 km through Australia from one end to the other ! And it goes fast !

And eh, welcome to PF !

It's great and nobody let's himself be discouraged when others say hey this has been thought of before !

 

[OmCheeto]

Hello , this is my first post.

I just had this crazy idea if you can make a car that you can drive forever. I just want to check if this is possible.

I know that the "motor powers the generator and generator powers the motor" thing doesn't work. Cause it isn't 100% efficient and bla bla bla. But what if you still do this and let's say that you can get 80% back. So that the motor powers the generator and the generator powers the motor back by 80% and that the other 20% you power with solar panels.

So my question is will this work and if not why will it not work ?View attachment 87286

Yes. It will work. But as you said, it's not 100% efficient, so it's the same thing as driving around in any car with the brakes partially applied. You can still move, but it's a waste of energy. So ultimately, the battery would go dead, and then your 80% efficient motor generator system would imply that the solar panel would only provide 16% of your your original 100% power.

 

[Ketch22]

These types of questions are a great use of design engineering. I would propose that a better approach is to as closely as possible calculate the drag of the car through the air. Add to this the power required to ascend hills and the parasitic loss of driving the generator. Subtract the approximate gain of %75 recovery in descending hills and braking. What you will know is how much power is required to move your car in the fictional world you modeled. I think that you will find it to be well over %20 reinforcement required. Also then consider more hills or more winds or heavier payload.

The Australian racers get amazing results but only when they operate in their narrowly defined envelope. I am not trying to trample your idea. In theory it works, however many new ideas get a bad reputation as they come to life without a connection to actual service.

 

[OmCheeto]

Raruba, you aren't from NASA are you? Your doodle looks just like a NASA test vehicle I mentioned a while back.

[ref]

 

[Khashishi]

If you are running on electricity, it only makes sense to run the generator when breaking. This is what hybrid electric vehicles do, and some fully electric vehicles. If you run the generator while cruising, it will increase the resistance, like riding with the breaks on.
Internal combustion engine cars have small generators which they do run while the car is cruising to generate electricity for things like headlights, controls, and ignition. But there's no point in doing that if your engine runs on electricity, since you get back less than you put in.

 

[russ_watters]

I know that the "motor powers the generator and generator powers the motor" thing doesn't work. Cause it isn't 100% efficient and bla bla bla. But what if you still do this and let's say that you can get 80% back. So that the motor powers the generator and the generator powers the motor back by 80% and that the other 20% you power with solar panels.

So my question is will this work and if not why will it not work ?View attachment 87286

So, when running on motor, generator and solar panels, you get:
80+20-100 = 0 power applied to the wheels. So this car wouldn't move.

Why not just run straight off the solar panels and skip the waste of the inefficiency of your motor/generator system?

 

[Vespa71]

Regenerating electricity by braking is appx 40% eff. (according to jurassictest,ch) accelerating electricly is appx. 75% eff. Friction and aerodynamic losses are about 12 kwh pr. 100 km (Leaf 2013 figures). That's not counting heat and air conditioning. Then calculate power additions from solar panels. Good luck to you. Really.

 

[jack action]

Imagine your car running on solar panels and a motor only. How much power do you need? Well you evaluate your speed, the resistance caused by the wheels rolling and the drag force and calculate the power required, say 10 hp. Now you know that your motor must be able to produce 10 hp, so are your solar panels.

Now imagine you put generators on the wheels that can produce 100 hp with a 120 hp input. This power (120 hp) must be added to the resistance of the wheels and drag (10 hp). So now you need a motor that can handle 130 hp but, because the generators produce 100 hp, you also need solar panels that produce 30 hp.

You could do the same exercise with generators that produce 1000 hp with a 1200 hp input. Then you need a 1210 hp motor and solar panels that can produce 210 hp.

So you see that all you are doing is adding weight ... to introduce inefficiencies that must be compensated! The bigger the generator, the worst it is.

The lesson: The minimum size of your power source (in this case, your solar panels) is equal to the basic requirement of what you are trying to achieve (in this case, fight the wind and rolling resistance of a vehicle at a given speed). Anything you will add to the system will only introduce inefficiencies that you will need to compensate, i.e. you will need a bigger power source.