Caracterizing a subspace of L^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspace
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
[SOLVED] Caracterizing a subspace of L^2

Homework Statement



Call M the subspace of L²([0,1]) consisting of all functions of vanishing mean. I.e., u\in M \Rightarrow \int_0^1u(s)ds=0.

I am trying to find the dimension of the orthogonal of M,

M^{\perp}=\{x\in L^2([0,1]):\int_0^1x(s)u(s)ds=0 \ \forall u\in M\}

I would be surprised if M^{\perp} was anything other than the constant functions, but my attempts at a proof have been unsuccessful.

Any idea how to go at this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solved.
 
Last edited:
Was it the (a.e.) constant functions in the end?

Sorry I couldn't help -- been busy with studying for my finals!
 
morphism said:
Was it the (a.e.) constant functions in the end?

Sorry I couldn't help -- been busy with studying for my finals!

How could it be anything else? The set of vanishing mean functions is basically defined as the set of all u(x) such that <u(x),1>=0. L^2 is a norm up to a.e.
 
Well, yeah... :-p
 
morphism said:
Well, yeah... :-p

Nice to talk to an erudite and sophisticated gentleman for a change. Instead of a bonehead. :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top