Carbon Dating on Mars: Possibility & Limitations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Master Wayne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon Mars
AI Thread Summary
Radiometric dating can be applied to rocks from Mars, but carbon dating is not suitable since it is designed for organic materials found on Earth. If life were discovered on Mars, carbon dating could theoretically be used, but it would require recalibration due to differences in atmospheric conditions and cosmic ray interactions compared to Earth. The varying levels of nitrogen and cosmic rays on Mars would affect the amount of C14 present, leading to potential inaccuracies. Overall, while radiometric dating methods exist for Martian rocks, carbon dating poses significant challenges. Accurate dating on Mars would depend on understanding these environmental factors.
Master Wayne
Messages
26
Reaction score
3
Hi!

I would like to know two things:

1. Is it possible to use radiometric dating on samples of rocks collected from Mars?
2. If so, in which situations would such method be impossible to use or would wield inaccurate results?

Thanks a lot for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Radiometric dating, yes. But not carbon dating since carbon dating is used to date things like wood or other material derived from living things. You won't find any of that in Mars. But if you want to date rocks using radiometric methods (other than C14), then it should work.
 
Last edited:
What if we found life in Mars, for an example? Would carbon dating work the same way it did on earth?
 
In principle yes, but it would have to be recalibrate. On Earth the amount of C14 in the atmosphere is kept more or less constant because the amount of decay is in equilibrium with C14 production in collisions of cosmic rays with Nitrogen atoms. On Mars the amount of nitrogen in the atmosphere and the amount of cosmic rays are different so the amount of C14 is bound to be different. Note as well that we're implicitly assuming that the life form is drawing its carbon from the atmosphere. That's usually the case on Earth, but there are exceptions.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top