Cars & Corrosion: 6 Testing Methods & Protection

  • Thread starter Thread starter dorkydoorknob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cars Corrosion
AI Thread Summary
Corrosion in cars is primarily caused by metal exposure to electrolytes like water and salt, which is often used on roads in winter. Ventilation helps prevent corrosion by creating a dry environment that limits moisture accumulation. Mud contributes to corrosion by retaining moisture and contaminants, such as salt, that accelerate the process. Various alloys are used in car manufacturing, with steel being common, and protective measures against corrosion include coatings and design modifications. For more detailed information on corrosion testing methods and protection strategies, resources like sae.org and nace.org can be useful.
dorkydoorknob
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Here's some questions I need help with...
Its about Cars & Corrosion

1. Name six ways that corrosion was tested on cars.
2. State two reasons that corrosion is not benificial.
3. How does ventilation stop corrosion?
4. In what way does mud contribute to corrosion?
5. What are the two metals in:
a) the gas (petrol) cap
b) light fixture
6) List five protective measures taken by Austin rover to protect against corrosion.
And I got the other questions. So if u could even ehlp me with just one..that'd b such a help.thanks so much:wink:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show your work, or what you have discovered so far.

Corrosion generally involves a metal and an electrolyte, most often water. In parts of the country, salt is put the roads during winter to help melt the ice and snow, but this then leads to salt water corrosion of vehicles using the roads.

Around coastlines, salt from the ocean is also a problem.

Cars use several different alloys, but steels are/have been common.

Mud simply provides for collection of moisture (moisture retention) and contaminants like salt.

Ventilation permits a 'dry' environment, i.e. no electrolyte, which will slow, stop (or otherwise retard) the corrosion process.

Browse at www.sae.org[/url] and [url]www.nace.org[/URL] for corrosion topics, or google on "automobile","corrosion".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top