Car's maximum velocity in a straight then deceleration

leathley
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We are doing a project to find the quickest time round a given track in a car.
friction: k=1.6
mass of car m=750kg
power of engine w=350kw
g=9.8
distance x=500m

After a corner, the car comes out at velocity=31.9m/s
There is a 500m straight next but have to finish it at 31.9m/s for next corner.
I need to know the fastest way to complete the 500m.
how can i work out the maximum velocity i can go and when to start braking?
i think we found the braking eqaution was a=-gk but we are basically really stuck!
any help would be greatly appreciated!
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!


Hi leathley! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Call the maximum speed v …

then use the appropriate constant acceleration equation twice, once to find the distance needed to accelerate up to that speed, and once to find the distance needed to decelerate under braking back to 31.9m/s …

then choose v so that the distances add up to 500m :wink:
 
distance needed to get to vmax, s = (vmax^2 -vi^2)/2a or what? can't just do the reverse for the other distance because s1 + s2 will cancel each other out.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top