A Cart pendulum problem when the pendulum is a beam with torsional stiffness

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a derivation related to a cart-pendulum system where the pendulum is modeled as a beam with torsional stiffness. The presence of a torsional spring at the base of the column is acknowledged, and the complexity of the actual structure is noted, suggesting that torsional stiffness can be approximated using dummy loads. The conversation hints at the importance of resonance between vibrations characterized by k_b and k_c, particularly in relation to earthquake simulations. Sinusoidal results indicate that resonance is present if k_b and k_c are appropriately defined. The speaker has experimented with state representation and the effects of removing k_b stiffness at various time steps, yielding expected behaviors.
Mishal0488
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
The cart pendulum problem however the pendulum is a beam with a torsional stiffness
Hi Guys

Please refer to my attached derivation, do you think it is acceptable?
There is a torsional spring at the base of the column. in reality the column is going to be a complex structure however the torsional stiffness can be approximated using dummy loads on the structural model.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
1733615390176.png

I have not followed your calculations fully. As a hint for verifivation, have you observed resonance between vibrations with k_b and k_c, in resemblance of earthquakes ?
 
I have got sinusoidal results, if k_b and k_c are appropriate resonance does exist. When representing the system in state representation (1st order differential equations) I have played around with removing the k_b stiffness at different time steps and I do get behavior that I expect.
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top