I am looking at page 930-931 Of Riley, Hobson, Bence.
They go from:
e'j,= Sij ei
X'i = (S[tex]^{-1}[/tex])ij Xj
Define L as inverse of matrix S
X'i = Lij Xj, since rotations of coordinate axes are rigid, transformation matrix L is orthogonal, thus the inverse transformation is
Xi = Lji X'j and
Lik Ljk = [tex]\delta[/tex]ij and Lki Lkj = [tex]\delta[/tex]ij
"furthermore, in terms of basis vectors of the primed and unprimed Cartesian coordinate system, the transformation matrix is given by
Lij = e'i dot ej
I understand the cosine formula for dot product but do not see how the transformation matrix follows from this argument. I am starting to get the Latex, but all the i's and j's are of course subscripts.
Thanks