Cascaded low pass filters problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stef42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filters
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the voltage transfer function for a coupled RC network, specifically showing that Vout/Vin equals (1 - ω²C²R² + 3jωCR). The user initially struggles with the concept of combining impedances and understanding the difference between impedance and reactance. After some back-and-forth, they successfully apply the relationship V = IZ to analyze the circuit, leading to the correct derivation of the transfer function. The distinction between reactance as the imaginary part and resistance as the real part of impedance is clarified. The conversation concludes with the user expressing satisfaction in resolving their confusion.
Stef42
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given the coupled RC network shown below (see attachment), show that the voltage transfer function is
\frac{Vout}{Vin}=\frac{1}{(1-\omega^2C^2R^2)+3j\omega CR}

Hint: \frac{Vout}{Vin}=\frac{V1}{Vin}\frac{Vout}{V1}

Homework Equations


For Capacitor, Z=\frac{1}{j\omega C}
General Potential divider equation Vout=\frac{Z2}{Z1+Z2}Vin

The Attempt at a Solution


I find this all a bit confusing :( I know that the second filter is acting as a load for the first filter, so I know I just can't write
V1=\frac{1}{j\omega C}\frac{1}{R+\frac{1}{j\omega C}}Vin
So would I need to combine the total impedance of the second filter with the impedance of the first capacitor?
Actually, could someone clear up impedance and reactance? For a capacitor reactance is
X=\frac{1}{\omega C}
while its impedance is
Z\frac{1}{j\omega C}
So if a resitor is connected in series, how/what would I combine to obtain the total resistance/impedance?

Any help would be appreciated, I think you can tell that my ideas are a bit muddled :s
thanks
SG
 

Attachments

  • circuit.jpg
    circuit.jpg
    6 KB · Views: 610
Physics news on Phys.org
Just like to say I finally got it :)
I just used V=IZ really.
Say that current I flows through the first filter and current I_{1} goes through the second one.
Starting from the right, I_{1}=j\omega C\times V_{out}

RI_{1}=j\omega CR V_{out}

V_{1}=RI_{1}+V_{out}=(j\omega CR+1) V_{out}

RI=R(I_{1}+j\omega C V_{1})=(2j\omega CR-\omega^2 C^2R^2)V_{out}

V_{in}=RI+V_{1}=(1+3j\omega CR-\omega^2 C^2R^2) V_{out}

hence original result is obtained.
 
Glad you figured it out! If you still need to know the difference between impedance and reactance, it's quite simple: reactance is the imaginary part of impedance. Plus resistance is the real part of impedance.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top