CASM part III cambridge/ Imperial RQF /Durham EPP

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a master's student in astronomy weighing three prestigious UK master's program offers against a potential 6-month cosmology project in India. The options include Cambridge's Part III Math, Imperial's Masters in Relativistic Quantum Fields, and Durham's Masters in Elementary Particle Theory. The student expresses concerns about funding for PhD applications in the UK, noting that funding for taught master's courses is scarce. Participants emphasize the importance of choosing a program that enhances competitiveness for future PhD funding, with a strong recommendation for Cambridge's rigorous course due to its international reputation and comprehensive curriculum. The consensus suggests that completing a master's at a reputable institution in the UK is more beneficial than a less recognized project in India, particularly for advancing in cosmology.
abhaskar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hello

i am currently doing my masters in astronomy from a UK university..i didnt apply for any phds this year for i felt i didnt have the right kind of knowledge..so i thought another masters would do me good (am interested in cosmology)

now i have three offers (am an international student and none of these offers have scholarship offers)
1. Cambridge part III math
2. Imperial - Masters in Relativistic Quant. Fields
3. Durham- Masters Elementary Particle Theory

although after much thought..i contacted someone in India(my home country) and now i have good chances of getting a project for like 5-6 months in cosmology in India.

any suggestions on what i should do? i am going to apply this year for phds in UK but the dearth of funding is sort of depressing me.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well usually I'd be the one asking that sort of question... but as no-one else has replied here's my 2c:
Funding for taught masters' courses in physics is largely nonexistent as you're not contributing anything to the world's body of knowledge (yet :wink: ) It's much easier (although I'd guess still not a walkover) to get funding for a PhD. So if I were you I'd choose the option that put you in the best position to compete for funding next year, and I'd tentatively suggest that that wouldn't be working in India for 6 months, as you wouldn't follow any sort of recognised syllabus and I don't know of any Indian universities that have the same kind of international reputation as the options available to you in the UK.
They're all pretty prestigious courses (Durham possibly less so- I may be biased as a Durham undergrad!); do well in any of them and you'll be in a very strong place to apply for PhD funding next year. This is especially true of the Cambridge course; the difficulty of the CASM is the kind of thing I'm told Cambridge LECTURERS tell "war stories" about, and it's internationally recognised as being a very demanding course. Also, if you have a look at the lecture courses available to you, the CASM is probably the one you'd find the best preparation for a PhD in cosmology unless you're specifically interested in the interface between particle physics and cosmology- the Durham course isn't called "MSc in Elementary particle theory" for nothing!
If I were in your position (and all having gone well with my exams this year, in a year's time I'm hoping to be!) I'd bite Cambridge's hand off if you can possibly afford to live for the year.
 
What was your undergraduate degree in? I'll guess, for argument's sake, Physics, so then you have an undergrad degree in Physics and a Master's degree in Astronomy. The first natural question is why did you do a master's in Astronomy if you want to study Cosmology, unless it was really more Astrophysics/Cosmology courses?

I don't know anything about the Durham course. The Imperial course is more physics, but it is all theoretical physics, so will prepare you for a PhD in Cosmology well. Part III at Cambridge has the added bonus that there are many many more courses, both from the pure maths, and the from the theoretical physics side. I'd suggest that you do Part III, as it will greatly improve both your maths and theoretical physics simultaneously, which will benefit you hugely for you Comsology research. I've also heard that if you manage to make it through Part III, then you will have a very close to 100% chance of getting a PhD place somewhere in the country. Good luck!
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top