Catapult Shooting Distance: 76.79m

  • Thread starter Thread starter robax25
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum shooting distance of a catapult using a 4 m lever and a 150 kg rock. The initial calculation yielded a distance of 76.79 m, but participants suggest revising the methodology to account for the moment of inertia of both the lever and the rock. There is also a debate on the timing of the rock's release, with suggestions that releasing it before the lever reaches vertical could enhance the distance. Participants emphasize the importance of clearly documenting calculations rather than using images. The conversation highlights the need for accurate physics principles to determine the correct shooting distance.
robax25
Messages
238
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A catapult has got a thin slender cylindrical lever of 4 m length and 50 kg mass (ignore the
detailed spoon kind of shape). Loading the spring mechanism took 2 minutes with a constant
power of 2000 W. A rock of 150 kg is put at the tip of the lever in the horizontal position. In
order to shoot the rock, the lever is rotating from the horizontal to the vertical position. The
rock is gaining potential as well as motion energy. Calculate the maximum shooting distance!

Homework Equations



mgh=0.5*m*v²
x=vt

The Attempt at a Solution


x=76.79m[/B]
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
question is that either I am right or wrong? I do not have any solution.
 
Your methodology looks OK but 1) the moment of inertia of a rod about one end is mL^2 / 3 and the moment of inertia of the rock is ML^2; 2) the potential energy of the lever and rock in the vertical position is mgL/2 + MgL. Make those changes and recalculate the distance and I'll let you know if we agree.
 
robax25 said:
Calculate the maximum shooting distance!
robax25 said:
the lever is rotating from the horizontal to the vertical position.
It is not entirely clear that the rock is released when the arm is vertical. A greater range may be achieved by releasing it earlier, when the rock's velocity has an upward component. Indeed, if there is nothing to prevent it, it might naturally launch sooner. However, we would not then know how much unused energy remains in the spring.
 
robax25 said:
question is that either I am right or wrong? I do not have any solution.

PF standards are that you avoid posting images, but type out your work (reserving images for diagrams, etc). Consult the Guidelines for more on this issue.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top