Cauchy Integral Formula - Multiple Possible Solutions?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Cauchy Integral Formula in complex analysis, specifically analyzing the integral \(\int_C \frac{1}{(z-a)(z-b)} \mathrm{d}z\) where the closed curve \(C\) encloses points \(a\) and \(b\). Participants are exploring the implications of applying the formula under conditions where the function may not be holomorphic due to the presence of singularities.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss two potential approaches to evaluate the integral, leading to different results based on the choice of function \(f(z)\). Questions arise regarding the validity of these approaches and whether the discrepancies are due to a misunderstanding of the Cauchy Integral Formula.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the requirements for the Cauchy Integral Formula, noting that the function must be holomorphic within the contour. There is an acknowledgment of the complexities introduced by multiple singularities and the potential need for the Residue Theorem, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of singularities within the contour and the conditions under which the Cauchy Integral Formula applies, highlighting the importance of understanding holomorphic functions in this context.

Leveret
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
Cauchy Integral Formula -- Multiple Possible Solutions?

I'm in the process of teaching myself some complex analysis, and I ran into the following conundrum:

Homework Statement


Suppose one was given an integral,
[tex]\int_C \frac{1}{(z-a)(z-b)} \mathrm{d}z[/tex]
where C is a closed curve with a and b in its interior, oriented counterclockwise.

Homework Equations


[tex]f(a) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_C \frac{f(z)}{z-a} \mathrm{d}z[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems to me that one could approach this one of two ways, and thereby obtain one of two different solutions. One possibility would be to say:

[tex]f(z) = \frac{2 \pi i}{z-b}[/tex]
[tex]\int_C \frac{1}{(z-a)(z-b)} \mathrm{d}z = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_C \frac{f(z)}{z-a} \mathrm{d}z = f(a) = \frac{2 \pi i}{a-b}[/tex]

However, it seems equally valid to say:

[tex]f(z) = \frac{2 \pi i}{z-a}[/tex]
[tex]\int_C \frac{1}{(z-a)(z-b)} \mathrm{d}z = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_C \frac{f(z)}{z-b} \mathrm{d}z = f(b) = \frac{2 \pi i}{b-a}[/tex]

which differs from the former solution by a factor of -1. Is this by design, or am I missing something important about the Cauchy integral formula (which is completely plausible)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Leveret said:
I'm in the process of teaching myself some complex analysis, and I ran into the following conundrum:

Homework Statement


Suppose one was given an integral,
[tex]\int_C \frac{1}{(z-a)(z-b)} \mathrm{d}z[/tex]
where C is a closed curve with a and b in its interior, oriented counterclockwise.

Homework Equations


[tex]f(a) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_C \frac{f(z)}{z-a} \mathrm{d}z[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems to me that one could approach this one of two ways, and thereby obtain one of two different solutions. One possibility would be to say:

[tex]f(z) = \frac{2 \pi i}{z-b}[/tex]
[tex]\int_C \frac{1}{(z-a)(z-b)} \mathrm{d}z = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_C \frac{f(z)}{z-a} \mathrm{d}z = f(a) = \frac{2 \pi i}{a-b}[/tex]

However, it seems equally valid to say:

[tex]f(z) = \frac{2 \pi i}{z-a}[/tex]
[tex]\int_C \frac{1}{(z-a)(z-b)} \mathrm{d}z = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_C \frac{f(z)}{z-b} \mathrm{d}z = f(b) = \frac{2 \pi i}{b-a}[/tex]

which differs from the former solution by a factor of -1. Is this by design, or am I missing something important about the Cauchy integral formula (which is completely plausible)?

The Cauchy formula says that if f is homomorphic in the interior of C then your first result would hold: that is, the integral of f(z)/(z-a) would give 2*pi*f(a). However, f(z) = 1/(z-b) is not holomorphic (it has a pole at z = b in the interior of C) so the result need not hold.

RGV
 


Cauchy's Integral Formula requires f(z) to be analytic inside and on the boundary of the contour.

When there are multiple singularities within the contour, we use the Residue Theorem.
 


Gotcha, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K