Cauchy Intergral Formula sin(i)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Meggle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cauchy Formula
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating a complex integral using the Cauchy Integral Formula, specifically for the function sin(z) divided by z² + 1, over a contour defined by a circle of radius 2 centered at the origin. The original poster expresses uncertainty about handling sin(i) in their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the Cauchy Integral Formula and rewrites the denominator to identify singularities. They question the evaluation of sin(i) and whether it can be simplified incorrectly.
  • Some participants clarify that sin(i) is not equal to 1 and suggest using the exponential form of sin(z) for better understanding.
  • Others introduce the Residue Theorem as an alternative approach, noting the presence of multiple singularities within the contour.
  • One participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the applicability of the Cauchy Integral Formula due to multiple singular points.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different methods to approach the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the exponential form of sin(z) and the implications of having multiple singularities. There is no explicit consensus on the best method yet, as various interpretations and approaches are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of applying the Cauchy Integral Formula in the presence of multiple singularities, which has led to discussions about the Residue Theorem and the conditions under which each method is applicable.

Meggle
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Cauchy Intergral Formula sin(i)??

Homework Statement


Circle of radius 2 centered at the origin oriented anticlockwise. Evaluate:
[tex]\int\frac{sin(z)}{z^{2} +1}[/tex]

Homework Equations


I think I'm supposed to be using the Cauchy Integral Formula, so
[tex]\int\frac{f(z) dz}{z - z_{0}}[/tex] = 2[tex]\pi[/tex]if(z_{0})

The Attempt at a Solution


I rewrote z[tex]^{2}[/tex] +1 = (z + i)(z - i) and took z[tex]_{0}[/tex] = i , (suitable z[tex]_{0}[/tex] within the countour) so f(z) = [tex]\frac{sin(z)}{z + i}[/tex] .

Then 2[tex]\pi[/tex]if( [tex]_{0}[/tex] ) = 2[tex]\pi[/tex]i [tex]\frac{sin(i)}{i + i}[/tex]

But what do I do with sin(i)? Can I take i in polar form on my real/imaginary axis and say sin(i) = sin([tex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]) = 1 ? Is that correct or have I lost the plot somewhere?

(Sorry, I never seem to get the Latex quite right.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Yes it should be fine to leave it as sin(i). But clearly sin(i) =/= 1, so I'm not sure what you were trying to do at the end. Using sin(z) = (e^iz - e^(-iz)) / 2i should clarify this. The rest of your work seems fine.
 


Also, you may use the Residue Theorem to solve this problem.

1. Both i and -i are inside the circle of radius 2 (centered at origin), so you have 2 different singularities inside your closed contour.

2. sin(z) = (exp(iz) - exp(-iz))/2i
 


gomunkul51 said:
Also, you may use the Residue Theorem to solve this problem.

1. Both i and -i are inside the circle of radius 2 (centered at origin), so you have 2 different singularities inside your closed contour.

2. sin(z) = (exp(iz) - exp(-iz))/2i

:bugeye: O yes, I can't use Cauchy because there's more than one singular point. Cheers.
 


Ah yes, stupid oversight, since f was clearly not analytic on {z | |z| < 2}. So you have to use residue calculus, which is fine.

*EDIT* Actually, you can still use Cauchy (especially if you don't know the residue theorem). But you have to apply http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy%27s_integral_theorem" first before applying Cauchy's integral formula (this is slightly confusing but everything else is based on Cauchy's theorem). This is the correct way to deal with multiple singularities via the Cauchy integral formula, though on the few complex integrals I have looked at, it happened that I ditched this method in favor of residue calculus because the former is tedious.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K