CE BJT Amplifier - Collector Resistance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation and confusion surrounding the collector resistance (Ric) of a common emitter (CE) amplifier as presented in the textbook "Microelectronic Circuit Design." The key equation for Ric is highlighted as Ric = ro[1+gm(Re||r∏)], but a different version, Ric = ro(1+gm*Re), appears in summary tables without clear explanation of the transition. It is noted that the approximation assumes Re is much smaller than r∏, simplifying the equation. Additionally, it is emphasized that Ric should not exceed β*ro, highlighting the importance of understanding these approximations in the context of amplifier design. The discussion underscores the frustration with the lack of clarity in the text regarding these critical concepts.
hisotaso
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
We are studying single transistor amplifiers, and in the text where the collector resistance of the CE amplifier, Ric, is derived, the final equation is

Ric = ro[1+gm(Re||r∏)] (approximation)

This equation is highlighted and emphasized as something we should remember, then shown again in a large blue box on the next page as a "Design Note" (large emphasis in this text).

However in the table at the end of the section that summarizes the CE/CS amplifier design summary, and the big table at the end of the chapter that lists the design summary for all of the BJT amplifiers, the equation is given as

Ric = ro(1+gm*Re)

I have been looking for hours and there is nowhere that I can find where this transition takes place. The text is Microelectronic Circuit Design, 4th edition by Jaeger and Blalock. I am at a loss.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well they simply assume the Re<<r∏ so Re||r∏ ≈ Re

And sometime we use this version

Rci ≈ ro * (re + Re)/re

Where

re = 1/gm = 26mV/Ic

But Ric cannot be greater than Rci_max = β*ro for Common-base amplifier.
 
Thank you Jony130 for your reply. I apologizr for not being clearer, this is a common emitter amplifier (CE), I don't know if this makes a difference.

Also you have pointed out something that has been driving me crazy with this text, that is approximations are often made without explicitly stating so. This is frustrating when learning a new subject and not completely confident with the subject matter.
 
Simply you should always remember that if you use this equation
Ric = ro[1+gm(Re||r∏)]
If result is greater than β*ro your approximation equations tricks you. Because Ric can never exceed β*ro.
 
Last edited:
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top