Center of Mass Calculation for a Club-Axe: How Far from the Handle is the COM?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the center of mass (COM) of a club-axe, which consists of a 23.0 kg stone and a 2.8 kg stick. The initial attempt at the calculation resulted in an incorrect answer of 101.59 cm, while the correct COM is 91.9 cm from the handle end. Key errors included misunderstanding the positions of the center of gravity for both the handle and the stone. The importance of using the correct coordinates for the COM calculation is emphasized, as well as the need for proper parentheses in the equation. Accurate placement of mass along the lengths of the handle and stone is crucial for determining the correct COM.
michaeltozer13
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A club-axe consists of a symmetrical 23.0 kg stone attached to the end of a uniform 2.8 kg stick. The length of the handle is L1=91.0m and the length of the stone is L2=13.0cm. How far is the center of mass from the handle end of the club?

Homework Equations


Center of mass equation: COM=x1m1+x2m2/(m1+m2)

The Attempt at a Solution


so for my attempt i kept the lengths in cm, and my equation looks like this COM=(91.0x2.8)+(104x23.0)/(2.8+23.0).

The answer I am getting is 101.59 cm, which is wrong. The correct answer is 91.9cm. Any help??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
x1 isn't the length of the handle: it's the position of the center of gravity of the handle !
Likewise, x2 isn't the end of the stone but the x coordinate of the center of mass of the stone.

I do hope the glue at the end of the handle is strong enough :)

welcome to the world of PF !
 
michaeltozer13 said:
COM=(91.0x2.8)+(104x23.0)/(2.8+23.0).
I assume you mean ((91.0x2.8)+(104x23.0))/(2.8+23.0) (parentheses matter!)
That would be right if all of the mass of the stick were at 91cm from the end, all the mass of the stone at 104cm from the end. But they're not.
 
michaeltozer13 said:
The length of the handle is L1=91.0m
That's a very long handle!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top