Center of mass prob. with sigma notation, vectors

gn0m0n
Messages
33
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Prove the magnitude R of the position vector \vec{R} for the center of mass from an arbitrary point of origin is given by the equation

M^{2}R^{2} = M\sum{m_{i}r^{2}_{i} - \frac{1}{2}\sum{m_{i}m_{j}r_{ij}^{2}



Homework Equations



\vec{R} = \frac{1}{M} \sum{m_{i}\vec{r}_{i}

M=\sum{m_{i}

\vec{r}_{ij} = \vec{r}_i - \vec{r}_j

The Attempt at a Solution



OK, the simplest thing to start with is to simply dot \vec{R} with itself to get the magnitude R^{2} and then bring over M^{2} to the LHS. However, I'm not sure how to handle the dotting/squaring with the indices.

Would it be

M^{2}R^{2} = \sum{m_{i}\vec{r}_{i} \bullet \sum{m_{i}\vec{r}_{i}

OR

M^{2}R^{2} = \sum{m_{i}\vec{r}_{i} \bullet \sum{m_{j}\vec{r}_{j} ?

Can I then simplify that by bringing terms out of the summation, or the dot product inside?

My recollection of the summation rules is a bit fuzzy. Actually, I'm not sure I've used the summation notation along with vector operations before.

I've tried writing the squared magnitudes in the desired answer as dot products, too, which allowed me to do a lot of rewriting but I can't connect the givens to the answer yet.

I.e.,
r^{2}_{i} = \vec{r}_{i} \bullet\vec{r}_{i}
r^{2}_{ij} = \vec{r}_{ij} \bullet\vec{r}_{ij} = (\vec{r}_{i}-\vec{r}_{j}) \bullet (\vec{r}_{i}-\vec{r}_{j}) = \vec{r}_{i} \bullet\vec{r}_{i} - 2\vec{r}_{i} \bullet\vec{r}_{j} + \vec{r}_{j} \bullet\vec{r}_{j}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry that looks kind of rough, I'm no expert at TeX.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top