Center on mass trigonometric trick

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on challenges faced in solving center of mass problems involving collisions, particularly the reliance on trigonometric techniques for analyzing vectors in both the center of mass and lab frames. The user seeks advice or tricks to simplify these types of problems, specifically referencing scenarios like two balls colliding. An example is mentioned, but the user finds it difficult to explain fully. The conversation highlights a common struggle in classical physics coursework related to visualizing and calculating collision dynamics. Overall, the need for clearer strategies in handling these problems is emphasized.
barak
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
hey there I am doing a lot of center of mass problem most of them with collisions , and most of the solutions I see, have a big part of "trigonometric trciks", like the way u watch the vectors in cm frame and the way in the lab frame. does anyone met this kind of solutions and have some tricks or advices that wil be great.
btw I am in classical physics (course)
thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you got an example of such a question?
 
well it pretty hard to explain but ill just say that the proble,m is of two balls striking each other and in the first graph is the cm graph the other one is the lab frame.
I hope it will help/ and there are a lot of problems like that
 

Attachments

  • physics.jpg
    physics.jpg
    27.7 KB · Views: 414
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top