Center on mass trigonometric trick

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on challenges faced in solving center of mass problems involving collisions, particularly the reliance on trigonometric techniques for analyzing vectors in both the center of mass and lab frames. The user seeks advice or tricks to simplify these types of problems, specifically referencing scenarios like two balls colliding. An example is mentioned, but the user finds it difficult to explain fully. The conversation highlights a common struggle in classical physics coursework related to visualizing and calculating collision dynamics. Overall, the need for clearer strategies in handling these problems is emphasized.
barak
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
hey there I am doing a lot of center of mass problem most of them with collisions , and most of the solutions I see, have a big part of "trigonometric trciks", like the way u watch the vectors in cm frame and the way in the lab frame. does anyone met this kind of solutions and have some tricks or advices that wil be great.
btw I am in classical physics (course)
thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you got an example of such a question?
 
well it pretty hard to explain but ill just say that the proble,m is of two balls striking each other and in the first graph is the cm graph the other one is the lab frame.
I hope it will help/ and there are a lot of problems like that
 

Attachments

  • physics.jpg
    physics.jpg
    27.7 KB · Views: 418
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Let us take the Ampere-Maxwell law $$\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0\,\mathbf{J}+\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ Assume we produce a spark that is so fast that the ##\partial \mathbf{E}/\partial t## term in eqn.##(1)## has not yet been produced by Faraday’s law of induction $$\nabla \times \mathbf{E}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ since the current density ##\mathbf{J}## has not yet had time to generate the magnetic field ##\mathbf{B}##. By...