Centre of Mass of carpenter's L square -

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the center of mass of a carpenter's L-square by dividing it into two rectangles. The upper rectangle measures 14 cm by 4 cm, while the lower rectangle is 4 cm by 12 cm. Initial calculations for the coordinates of the center of mass yielded (3.8 cm, 5.8 cm), but the y-coordinate was identified as incorrect due to miscalculating the height of the upper rectangle. After clarifications, the correct approach involves adjusting the y-coordinate to account for the height of the lower leg, leading to a revised y-coordinate of 6.85 cm. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately determining the centroid positions and using the correct coordinate system for calculations.
wizzle
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A carpenter's square has the shape of an
"L," as shown at the right. Find the
coordinates of its center of mass, assuming
it to be made of uniform, material. (Hint:
divide the L-shape into two rectangles.)

Homework Equations



MaXa+MbXb/(Ma + Mb)


The Attempt at a Solution



I separated the L shape into two rectangles, with the upper part of the L being a rectangle of 14 cm x 4 cm, and the lower part of the L is a rectangle measuring 4 cm by 12 cm. I found the centre of mass of the upper rectangle to be (2,9) and of the lower rectangle to be (6,2). For the mass, since it's of uniform material, I used the area as its mass (not sure if that's right). The technique I tried was to first find the x-coordinate of the object's centre of mass:

(2x56)+(6x48) / (56+48) = 3.846 cm

For the y coordinate I used the y values of each rectangle:

(9 x 56)+(2x48) / (56+48) = 5.77 cm

So the centre of mass I got was (3.8 cm, 5.8 cm). Were the steps I used sensible?

Thanks a lot!
-Lauren
 

Attachments

  • COM question.jpg
    COM question.jpg
    11 KB · Views: 4,680
Physics news on Phys.org
The x is correct, the y is wrong. You are calculating it with respect to the bottom of the L. Is the y-coordinate of the centroid of the upper rectrangle then equal to 9?

Note: you can check your answer by considering two different rectangles. One large one that covers the entire L, substracted by a smaller one that is enclosed within the legs.
 
Last edited:
Ahh...thank you. Since I separated the two at y=4 cm, then the upper rectangle is 14 cm high. Should I have put

(7x56)+(2x48) / (56+48) = 4.69 cm for the y coordinate? Thanks for your help!
 
The upper is indeed 14 cm high, and if considered alone, its centroid would be at y = 7 cm. However, since there is a horizontal leg element as well, and you place the coordinate system in the lower left corner of the L, the centroid of the upper retrangle moves up by 4 cm, which is the height of the lower leg. See this webpage for some illustrations.
 
Hi! Thanks a lot for attaching that link, it really helped. I think I've got it this time, since I'm using the right coordinates -
(11x56)+(2x48) / (56+48) = 6.85 cm
I appreciate your time srvs!
 
Pleasure. To double-check you could different rectangles as well. Haven't got a picture but if you consider a rectangle that spans from the most bottom-left corner of your L, and across the entire L then its dimensions are 18 by 12. The rectangle between the legs of the L is 14 by 12, so you could also say that with respect to the bottom of the larger rectangle, y = [ (14+4)/2 * (14+4 * 12) - (4 + 14/2) * 14 * (12 - 4) ] / [ (14+4 * 12) - 14 * (12 - 4) ] = 6.85 cm. So you consider instead the surface area and y coordinate of the large rectangle and substract from that the surface area and y coordinate of the smaller one.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top