I Centrifugal Effects During Rail Launch

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of incorporating centrifugal effects from Earth's rotation in a 3DOF simulation for a rocket during its launch on a rail. It highlights the need to account for centripetal forces while the rocket is still constrained to the rail, particularly when launching in a west-east direction to leverage Earth's rotational speed. The Coriolis effect is also addressed, emphasizing its significance when the rail has a north-south component, as it alters the rocket's trajectory based on latitude. Participants discuss the complexities of managing these forces for various launch azimuths and sites. The conversation underscores the importance of accurately modeling these dynamics for effective simulation.
GrndCtrl2MjrTom
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Question about centrifugal effects on rocket during translation along a rail.
I’m writing a 3DOF sim for a rocket. I’m having a hard time visualizing centrifugal effects from the Earth's rotation on the rocket while it is moving along the rail (acceleration > 0).

I know that once it has left the rail I no longer need to account for it since it’s in the ECI frame and unconstrained with the earth. I’m just wondering how to deal with centrifugal effects during the rail launch since two of the body axes are still constrained.

I suppose I could rotate the centripetal ECEF components to the body coordinate frame and subtract out the roll component then I could rotate back to ECEF? Does this approach sound valid or am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the rail is aligned in the west-east direction (I assume you would be sending the rocket on a west to east path to take advantage of the Earth's rotational speed), it is easy to work out the centripetal force required to keep it on the rail: ##F_c = \frac{mv^2}{R}## where v is the total speed of the rocket relative to the inertial frame of the centre of the Earth (ie. it includes the speed due to Earth rotation).

If there is a component of the rail that is in the north-south direction other than at the equator, you would have to take into account the Coriolis effect. The Coriolis effect (or force, if you are analysing it from the non-inertial rocket reference frame) arises if the rocket is moving in a direction other than parallel to the Earth's axis of rotation. This change results from the change in the rotational speed of the Earth surface/rail. The distance to the axis of rotation changes with change in latitude.

AM
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes GrndCtrl2MjrTom
You are absolutely correct, thank you. I am trying to write this for any arbitrary launch azimuth and launch site, its just hard to remember everything that is acting on the rocket while on the ground haha.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'

The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Gravity at Earth's poles vs equator
Replies
12
Views
2K
I On whether the motion of a Foucault pendulum bob is comparable to ballistics
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Need help with overly ambitious rocket project
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Earth's angular velocity when axis is aligned with apparent gravity
Replies
1
Views
1K
I I need some support, please, for a gravity assist analysis
2
Replies
86
Views
7K
Why Don't Rockets Use Centrifugal Force for Launch?
Replies
8
Views
6K
A Order of rotations due to torque in 3DOF in simulations
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Confusion while trying to build intuition of centripetal force
Replies
15
Views
3K
How Does a Human Centrifuge Simulate Gravity for Astronauts?
Replies
8
Views
4K
Issues with Apollo 11 TLI Simulation – Discrepancies in Return Orbit
Replies
3
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top