Centrifugaleffect on lubricant exerted on small or large gear

  • Thread starter Thread starter klauspetersen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gear
klauspetersen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Chain lubricant must be applied to two gears connected by a chain.

The two gears are of different size. The question is now, if it is better to apply the lubricant at the larger or smaller gear, if we wanted to minimize the amount of lubricant lost due to centrifugal force.

The math:

Centrifugal force:

F= V^2 / R

Since the two gears are connected by a chain, V should be the same. Therefore my math intuition says that the larger of the gears would exert less centrifugal force on the lubricant. Am i correct in this analysis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
That sounds like safe reasoning for that question: you are saying that since the speed of the outer rim of each gear is the same (due to chain) then the centrifugal force is inversely proportional to the radius of each gear. Therefore: applying lube to the bigger cog minimizes the force. Assuming the lubricant sticks equally hard to each gear, this minimizes the potential loss of lubricant due to the centrifugal effect.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top