roberttk01 said:
Well if you are getting at Hooke's Law and the spring's constant increasing at a linear rate until the spring cannot stretch anymore, I do not believe that that is it...
That's not what I'm getting at, no. I actually meant exactly what I said: you should proceed by describing the experiment in simple terms, using words (as opposed to math), and answer the questions. Which you did below:
I forgot to answer your last two questions, although I am sure that you can probably extract that information from the procedure.
1) The apparatus is to spin the hanging weight, while a spring connects it to the rotating shaft, to measure the rotation rate after 50 revolutions.
2) The aim is supposed to display to relationship between the tension force required to stretch the spring from Xo to Xo+the displacement of the mass due to centripetal force, ultimately to find the percentage of error and circular acceleration of the mass.
OK - so the answer to question 2. was
"The aim of the experiment is to verify the relationship between angular velocity and centripetal acceleration."
To do this you need two independent ways to get the centripetal acceleration.
One you get from the circular motion theory, which you are testing; and the other you get from a more reliable direct method, which has already been well established - like Newton's force law.
The method was to suspend a pendulum from a turntable.
You measure the angular speed and the radial displacement of the pendulum bob.
The radial displacement tells you the centripetal force.
To make the calculation easier - you are spinning the turntable+pendulum so a pre-chosen radial displacement has been produced. This is one where you have measure the force already ... that's what the mucking about with a spring was about.
Initially I thought you were spinning the whole thing with both string and spring attached.
Now I don't think you were supposed to do that so if you did, you have made some extra work for yourself.