Centripetal force apparatus lab

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on conducting a centripetal force apparatus lab, specifically addressing pre-lab questions about the economy force sensor. The 'Tare' button on the sensor is used to set the force reading to zero, which requires ensuring no force is applied before pressing it, and it's important to reset this frequently to account for drift in readings. Clarification is sought regarding the relationship between the sensor's voltage and the force measurement. Additionally, there's confusion about whether velocity remains constant in relation to radius and centripetal force, with an explanation provided that if radius is unchanged, velocity will also remain constant to keep the ratio v²/r steady. Overall, the discussion emphasizes understanding the sensor's functionality and the principles of centripetal motion.
MickeyGoh
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Actually, I am going to do a centripetal force apparatus lab tmr morning.
Here I get some pre-lab questions.

In this lab, we are going to use economy force sensor (as I know there are 2 types, but it doesn't matter).
There is one question related to this sensor...
It says "The 'Tare' button on the economy force sensor is to set the force to be zero. How to verify the result? Hint: Observe the curve."

First question, what result? That the force is really zero? Is the voltage of the electric motor 0V indicating that the force is 0N?

Second question, what curve? I don't get the relation of it with voltage. Or is it not related to the voltage?Besides, in the experiment of Centripetal force vs Mass, there is a question asking whether the velocity is a constant or not. It seems an easy question and I should know...
But somehow I forget it. Is the velocity increasing with the radius and thus keeping v2/r a constant? Or both v and r are constants so that v2/r is already a constant?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MickeyGoh said:
It says "The 'Tare' button on the economy force sensor is to set the force to be zero.

On the force sensors that I've used, the button simply sets the display to read zero, for whatever value the actual force is at that moment. You normally use it by first ensuring that there is no force being applied to the sensor (e.g. by letting a string tied to it go slack), then pressing the button.

As time passes, this "zero setting" tends to drift so that when no force is applied, the sensor reads a small nonzero value. Therefore I always make sure to reset the zero frequently during the course of the experiment.
 
But do you know what the question wants me to answer?
 
for the velocity one, i think i get it.
Since v = 2πr / t
so if r is unchanged, v will not be changed. i.e. kept constant
 
or simply to say
as centripetal force vs mass, v2/r is constant
as r is unchanged, v should be unchanged to keep v2/r constantbut i still don't get the 'tare' button question
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top