Centripetal force apparatus lab

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on conducting a centripetal force apparatus lab, specifically addressing pre-lab questions about the economy force sensor. The 'Tare' button on the sensor is used to set the force reading to zero, which requires ensuring no force is applied before pressing it, and it's important to reset this frequently to account for drift in readings. Clarification is sought regarding the relationship between the sensor's voltage and the force measurement. Additionally, there's confusion about whether velocity remains constant in relation to radius and centripetal force, with an explanation provided that if radius is unchanged, velocity will also remain constant to keep the ratio v²/r steady. Overall, the discussion emphasizes understanding the sensor's functionality and the principles of centripetal motion.
MickeyGoh
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Actually, I am going to do a centripetal force apparatus lab tmr morning.
Here I get some pre-lab questions.

In this lab, we are going to use economy force sensor (as I know there are 2 types, but it doesn't matter).
There is one question related to this sensor...
It says "The 'Tare' button on the economy force sensor is to set the force to be zero. How to verify the result? Hint: Observe the curve."

First question, what result? That the force is really zero? Is the voltage of the electric motor 0V indicating that the force is 0N?

Second question, what curve? I don't get the relation of it with voltage. Or is it not related to the voltage?Besides, in the experiment of Centripetal force vs Mass, there is a question asking whether the velocity is a constant or not. It seems an easy question and I should know...
But somehow I forget it. Is the velocity increasing with the radius and thus keeping v2/r a constant? Or both v and r are constants so that v2/r is already a constant?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MickeyGoh said:
It says "The 'Tare' button on the economy force sensor is to set the force to be zero.

On the force sensors that I've used, the button simply sets the display to read zero, for whatever value the actual force is at that moment. You normally use it by first ensuring that there is no force being applied to the sensor (e.g. by letting a string tied to it go slack), then pressing the button.

As time passes, this "zero setting" tends to drift so that when no force is applied, the sensor reads a small nonzero value. Therefore I always make sure to reset the zero frequently during the course of the experiment.
 
But do you know what the question wants me to answer?
 
for the velocity one, i think i get it.
Since v = 2πr / t
so if r is unchanged, v will not be changed. i.e. kept constant
 
or simply to say
as centripetal force vs mass, v2/r is constant
as r is unchanged, v should be unchanged to keep v2/r constantbut i still don't get the 'tare' button question
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top