Centripital Acceleration/G-Force question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Schmidget
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In a scenario involving a pilot in a plane dive, the centripetal acceleration experienced is 7.5 times the acceleration due to gravity (g = 9.81 m/s²). The initial calculation of force using F=ma resulted in 3601.5 N, but it was incorrect because it did not account for the additional force due to gravity. The total force felt by the pilot combines both the centripetal and gravitational forces, resulting in an effective acceleration of 8.5g. This means the correct force exerted on the pilot is calculated by adding the gravitational force to the centripetal force. Understanding the distinction between centripetal and centrifugal acceleration is crucial in solving such problems accurately.
Schmidget
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A plane is in a dive. At the bottom of the dive is the maximum acceleration on the pilot. This part of the dive can be approximated by a circular path. If the centripetal acceleration on the pilot is 7.50 times g (=9.81 m/s2), what is the force felt by the pilot if her mass is 49.0 kg.


Homework Equations



Is it this simple?

F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution



F = (49kg)*(7.5*9.8m/s^2) = 3601.5N

According to the online answer checker, it's not correct. I guess I'm missing something. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Inside the plane the pilot will experience centrifugal acceleration which is opposite to the centripetal acceleration. So the total acceleration on the pilot will be 7.5g + g.
 
Of course! Now I feel kinda stupid. At one point in my thinking, I remember contemplating that, but for some reason it got lost. Oh well; you win some, you lose some.

Thanks for your help.
 
rl.bhat said:
Inside the plane the pilot will experience centrifugal acceleration which is opposite to the centripetal acceleration. So the total acceleration on the pilot will be 7.5g + g.

BS:mad:
(Although as Einstein noted, the acceleration of a free object
relative to the cockpit would indeed be 8.5g)

Amelia Ehrhart's acceleration is 7.5g upwards.
Gravity exerts a force mg downwards.
Applying Newton's second Law, the force exerted on
her backside is mg + 7.5mg straight up.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top