Chain rule problem with partial derivatives

issisoccer10
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Chain rule problem with partial derivatives

Homework Statement


Suppose that z = f(u) and u = g(x,y). Show that..

\frac{\partial^{2} z}{\partial x^{2}} = \frac{dz}{du} \frac{\partial^{2} u}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{d^{2} z}{du^{2}} \frac{(\partial u)^{2}}{(\partial x)^{2}}


Homework Equations


\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} = \frac{dz}{du} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}

based on the chain rule

The Attempt at a Solution


Based on the first order partial derivative above, I would think that using the product rule we can find the second order partial dervative of z w.r.t. x

Using my intuition, I consider \frac{dz}{du} and \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} like different terms and then apply the product rule.

However, I know this isn't correct because I am supposed to show that in the last term of the question equation we have \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} squared, rather than just \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} as I would conclude.

If my attempted solution doesn't make any sense, I'll try to clarify. But it is wrong either way and any help in finding the correct way to get the desired equation would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It might be clearer if you write the whole thing in terms of f and g. But you are on the right track, it's product rule and chain rule put together. When you take another d/dx derivative of dz/du you will get the second derivative of z together with yet another du/dx in addition to the one you've already got, giving you a (du/dx)^2. Do you see that, or do I need to tex it?
 
oh ok...so

the derivative of \frac{dz}{du} = \frac{d^{2} z}{du^{2}} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}

because we really are taking the derivative with respect to x.. so basically there was another chain that I didn't see..

is that right?
 
issisoccer10 said:
oh ok...so

the derivative of \frac{dz}{du} = \frac{d^{2} z}{du^{2}} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}

because we really are taking the derivative with respect to x.. so basically there was another chain that I didn't see..

is that right?

I think so. There's a chain you didn't see all right. If you get what you were supposed to then you are doing it right.
 
thanks a lot..
 


Would anyone tex the solution in a step by step form please?
Thank you in advance
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top